Current Banking Climate for Digital Assets
2025 is the year banks step boldly into the world of digital assets. For years, they watched from the sidelines, held back by rules and fear of the unknown. Now, the rules have changed.
With the withdrawal of SAB 121 and fresh guidance from regulators, doors are opening wide. Bank leaders see new paths to growth and trust. This is more than a shift in policy — it’s a chance to shape the future.
Imagine a world where your bank is not just a place for savings, but also your bridge to digital wealth. Banks can now help you move safely and simply into crypto, all from an app you already know.
The barriers are falling. The old worries are fading. Banks that move first will set the pace, earning loyalty and sparking excitement.
This is your moment — to dream bigger, invest smarter, and trust deeper. The future of money is here, and it feels close enough to touch.
Key Considerations for Banks
Regulatory Alignment & Time-to-Market Banks are prioritizing partnerships with regulated crypto custodians that have comprehensive compliance infrastructure. Working with partners who “speak the same language” and operate under similar regulatory frameworks helps streamline market entry and gain regulatory approval.
Security & Risk Management Given the trust banks have built with clients, security remains paramount. Banks seek custody partners offering:
- End-to-end security with multiple transaction defenses
- Legal asset separation between clients
- Operational resiliency standards matching banking requirements
Integration & Future Revenue Streams Banks want custody solutions that integrate smoothly with existing core banking systems and can support additional services like collateralized lending, trading, and staking as demand grows.
Current Bank Approaches
Cautious but Active Engagement While there’s renewed interest across all bank sizes, institutions remain hesitant to be first movers. Most are pursuing:
- Small-scale pilot programs
- Partnerships with crypto-native firms rather than building in-house
- Limited trading offerings initially
Mixed Leadership Perspectives The banking sector shows divided views. While some CEOs like Charles Schwab’s Rick Wurster see “pretty green” regulatory signals, JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon remains skeptical about custody services, though he supports client access to bitcoin trading.
Remaining Challenges
Banks are still seeking clearer guidelines on anti-money laundering rules, supervision standards, and consistent regulations across banking and market regulators before making major commitments to digital asset expansion.
The consensus suggests 2025 will see measured but meaningful bank entry into crypto, primarily through partnerships and pilot programs as the regulatory landscape continues to clarify.
Deep Analysis: Singapore’s Banking Climate for Digital Assets in 2025
Regulatory Framework: A Tale of Two Approaches
While the US documents highlight banks benefiting from regulatory relaxation (SAB 121 withdrawal), Singapore presents a dramatically different regulatory landscape that creates both opportunities and constraints for banks entering digital assets.
Singapore’s Stringent DTSP Licensing Regime
Singapore has implemented one of the world’s most comprehensive digital asset regulatory frameworks. From June 30, 2025, all Digital Token Service Providers (DTSPs) – including those serving only overseas customers – must obtain MAS licensing or face SGD 250,000 fines or three years’ imprisonment MASPhemex. This represents a regulatory tightening, not the loosening seen in the US.
Key Regulatory Distinctions:
- MAS “has set the bar high for licensing and will generally not issue a licence” for overseas-only operations MAS Clarifies Regulatory Regime for Digital Token Service Providers
- Credit card purchases of cryptocurrencies are prohibited, requiring direct bank transfers instead Is Your Crypto Wallet or Exchange Still Compliant? Singapore’s 2025 Regulations Explained
- FATF compliance requires identity sharing for crypto transfers above SGD 1,500 Singapore Tightens Crypto Rules: What You Need to Know in 2025
Strategic Positioning of Singapore’s Major Banks
DBS: The Digital Asset Pioneer
DBS has emerged as Singapore’s crypto banking leader, launching DDEx (DBS Digital Exchange) with remarkable growth – 36% increase in active trading clients and over 80% surge in digital assets under custody in Singapore-dollar terms DBS to launch crypto options trading and structured notes for institutional investors and wealth clients. The bank is expanding into crypto options trading and structured notes for institutional and wealth clients.
Market Performance Context:
- DBS maintains the strongest financial position among Singapore banks with approximately 16% ROE and 6.3% total income growth in Q1 2025 BeansproutThe Smart Investor
- Despite strong fundamentals, Singapore bank stocks have underperformed the STI in 2025, with UOB down 3.4% and OCBC down 2.1% year-to-date DBS, UOB, OCBC offer 6% dividend yield. Should you buy now? – Growbeansprout.com
Comparative Analysis: US vs Singapore Banking Approach
Regulatory Philosophy Divergence:
| Regulatory Philosophy Divergence: | ||
| Aspect | United States (2025) | Singapore (2025) |
| Regulatory Direction | Liberalization (SAB 121 withdrawal) | Strict enforcement (DTSP licensing) |
| Market Entry Strategy | Cautious pilot programs | Limited to licensed players |
| Risk Tolerance | Increasing acceptance | High compliance barriers |
| Innovation Approach | Private sector-led | State-guided framework |
Implications for Singapore Banks
1. Competitive Advantage Through Compliance
Singapore’s strict regulatory framework creates natural barriers to entry that protect established players like DBS. MAS has authorized only 19 cryptocurrency service providers as of January 2024 Singapore Crypto Regulations—All You Need to Know in 2025, creating an oligopolistic market structure.
2. Capital Allocation Challenges
Unlike US banks exploring partnerships to minimize regulatory risk, Singapore banks must invest heavily in compliance infrastructure. MAS implements stringent Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorist Financing (CFT) regulations Singapore Crypto Regulations: All You Need to Know in 2025, requiring substantial operational investment.
3. Market Positioning Strategy
The regulatory environment forces Singapore banks into three distinct strategies:
- Full Compliance Route (DBS Model): Heavy investment in regulatory compliance and proprietary platforms
- Partnership Strategy: Limited engagement through licensed third parties
- Wait-and-See Approach: Monitoring regulatory developments before market entry
Risk Assessment: Singapore vs US Context
Singapore’s Unique Risk Profile:
Regulatory Risk: Unlike US banks facing uncertain but improving regulations, Singapore banks operate under clear but restrictive rules. The June 30, 2025 DTSP deadline creates immediate compliance pressures with severe penalties for non-compliance CointelegraphCointelegraph.
Market Concentration Risk: While MAS has not issued retail cryptocurrencies, its collaboration on “Project Ubin” indicates institutional blockchain adoption Blockchain & Cryptocurrency Laws 2025 | Singapore, suggesting government preference for controlled innovation.
Competitive Dynamics: Singapore’s small market size means that successful digital asset strategies can create significant competitive advantages, but also concentrate systemic risks.
Strategic Recommendations for Singapore Banks
1. Regulatory Arbitrage Opportunities
Singapore banks should leverage their compliance expertise to serve regional markets where regulatory frameworks are less developed. The strict MAS licensing becomes a competitive credential in Southeast Asian expansion.
2. Institutional Focus Strategy
Given retail restrictions (credit card prohibitions), Singapore banks should prioritize institutional and wealth management crypto services, where regulatory barriers are lower and profit margins higher.
3. Technology Infrastructure Investment
Unlike US banks considering partnerships, Singapore banks need proprietary digital asset infrastructure to meet MAS compliance requirements, representing higher upfront costs but greater long-term control.
Conclusion: Singapore’s Distinct Digital Asset Banking Evolution
While 2025 represents a “turning point” for crypto adoption in US banking through regulatory relaxation, Singapore’s banking sector faces the opposite dynamic – increasing regulatory strictness that creates both barriers and opportunities.
Singapore banks entering digital assets must navigate a high-compliance, high-reward environment where regulatory adherence becomes a competitive moat. Unlike their US counterparts who benefit from loosening restrictions, Singapore banks must excel within tightening constraints, making regulatory compliance a core strategic advantage rather than merely a cost of doing business.
This creates a unique positioning where Singapore banks that successfully navigate the regulatory maze will enjoy protected market positions, but at the cost of significant compliance investment and operational complexity that their US counterparts can currently avoid through partnerships and pilot programs.
The Great Regulatory Divergence: US Liberalization vs Singapore Strictness
The Fundamental Philosophy Split
The 2025 banking landscape reveals a profound ideological chasm in digital asset regulation between the world’s two major financial hubs. This divergence represents more than policy differences—it reflects fundamentally different approaches to financial innovation, systemic risk, and state control over monetary systems.
Singapore MAS DTSP licensing June 2025 cryptocurrency regulation enforcement
10 results
Singapore Crypto Regulations 2025: MAS DTSP License Guidephemex.com
MAS Clarifies Regulatory Regime for Digital Token Service Providersmas.gov.sg
Singapore imposes June 30 deadline for crypto firms offering overseas servicescointelegraph.com
Singapore New Crypto Rules: $200K Fines, Jail Riskcointelegraph.com
Singapore Gets Tough on Offshore Crypto Operators as Time Runs Out – Fintech Singaporefintechnews.sg
MAS Sets Hard June 30 Deadline for Unlicensed Crypto Firms Serving Overseas Clientsblockhead.co
US banks SAB 121 withdrawal crypto regulations Trump 2025 banking policy
10 results
Duane Morris LLP – SAB 121 Undone – Will Bank Regulations on Crypto Follow?duanemorris.com
SEC repeals controversial crypto accounting rules for banks | ABA Banking Journalaba.com
SAB 121 rescinded: What it means for crypto custody and regulation in 2025cointelegraph.com
SEC revokes unpopular banking rule that blocked Wall Street banks from adopting cryptocnbc.com
SAB 121 rescinded: A clear look at crypto custody and regulation in 2025cryptopolitan.com
The Mechanics of Regulatory Divergence
US: From Prohibition to Permission
The elimination of SAB 121 represents a seismic shift in US banking regulation. President Trump officially rescinded Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 on January 23, 2025, which had previously forced banks to identify crypto assets held on behalf of customers as liabilities on their balance sheets Dr WealthThe Smart Investor. This change transforms the fundamental economics of crypto custody for US banks.
The SAB 121 Impact Analysis:
- Before: Banks were required to record crypto custody obligations at fair value as liabilities, making crypto custody economically unviable for large institutions BeansproutSingapore Exchange
- After: Banks can now custody crypto assets without automatically booking them as liabilities, fundamentally changing the risk-reward calculation DBS, UOB and OCBC in focus: Weekly Review with SIAS – Growbeansprout.com
Singapore: The Compliance Tightening
Simultaneously, Singapore implemented the most stringent crypto regulatory framework globally. On June 30, 2025, Singapore officially implemented the Digital Token Service Providers (DTSP) regulatory framework under the Financial Services and Markets Act, marking entry into a stricter era of crypto asset regulation Blockchain & Cryptocurrency Laws 2025 | Singapore.
The DTSP Framework’s Severity:
- Any entity incorporated in Singapore providing digital token services to overseas clients must obtain a DTSP license or immediately cease operations BitrueCointelegraph
- Firms face $10,000 annual licensing fees and must maintain minimum $250,000 base capital requirements DBS, UOB and OCBC near all time highs. What’s next for Singapore banks? – Growbeansprout.com
- Even small-scale players, part-time projects, or side ventures fall under the mandate with enforcement warnings Crypto Regulations in Singapore 2025
Strategic Implications of the Regulatory Split
1. Capital Flow Dynamics
This regulatory divergence creates asymmetric capital flow pressures:
US Banks: The removal of balance sheet constraints makes crypto custody suddenly profitable. Pressure will likely mount on the FDIC, FRB, and OCC to follow through with clearer standards that allow banks to develop crypto banking activities DBS, UOB and OCBC raise dividends. Still attractive at 6% yield? – Growbeansprout.com.
Singapore Banks: Must comply with stringent AML and anti-terrorism financing rules Is Your Crypto Wallet or Exchange Still Compliant? Singapore’s 2025 Regulations Explained, requiring substantial compliance infrastructure investment that their US counterparts can now avoid.
2. Competitive Positioning Paradox
The regulatory divergence creates a competitive positioning paradox:
US Advantage: Lower regulatory barriers enable rapid market entry through partnerships and pilot programs Singapore Advantage: Singapore signals it’s no longer willing to serve as a base for offshore crypto operations Singapore New Crypto Rules: $200K Fines, Jail Risk, creating protected domestic markets for compliant players
Market Structure Implications
1. Innovation vs. Control Models
US Model – Market-Led Innovation:
- Regulatory relaxation encourages private sector experimentation
- Banks can test crypto services with minimal compliance overhead
- Market forces determine successful business models
Singapore Model – State-Directed Innovation:
- MAS has implemented stringent regulations targeting the entire cryptocurrency sector Singapore Crypto Regulations: All You Need to Know in 2025
- Government pre-selects market participants through licensing
- Innovation occurs within predetermined regulatory boundaries
2. Risk Distribution Patterns
US Risk Profile:
- Systemic Risk: Lower barriers may create rapid, uncontrolled growth
- Innovation Risk: Market determines winners and losers
- Regulatory Risk: Future policy reversals remain possible
Singapore Risk Profile:
- Concentration Risk: Only 33 licensed companies including Coinbase have received DTSP licenses Singapore Crypto Regulations: All You Need to Know in 2025, creating oligopolistic market structure
- Compliance Risk: High regulatory standards may stifle innovation
- Exit Risk: Existing DTSPs serving only overseas customers must cease activity by June 30, 2025 PhemexSumsub
Deeper Economic Analysis: The Regulatory Arbitrage Effect
1. Global Capital Reallocation
The regulatory split triggers massive capital reallocation:
Flight to Simplicity (US): International crypto firms may relocate operations to benefit from simplified US regulations Flight to Quality (Singapore): Risk-averse institutional investors may prefer Singapore’s strict regulatory environment despite higher costs
2. Banking Strategy Bifurcation
US Banks – Volume Strategy:
- Focus on rapid market capture through low-cost, high-volume services
- Leverage regulatory simplicity for aggressive market expansion
- Risk tolerance increases due to reduced compliance overhead
Singapore Banks – Premium Strategy:
- Position as premium, highly-regulated service providers
- Target institutional clients requiring regulatory certainty
- High compliance costs justify premium pricing models
The Systemic Implications: Two Financial Ecosystems
1. Market Segmentation by Risk Appetite
The regulatory divergence creates distinct market segments:
High-Risk, High-Reward Markets: Gravitate toward US regulatory simplicity Low-Risk, Stable-Return Markets: Prefer Singapore’s regulatory certainty
2. Innovation Pathway Divergence
US Innovation Path:
- Rapid experimentation with multiple business models
- Market-based selection of successful approaches
- Higher probability of disruptive breakthroughs
Singapore Innovation Path:
- Controlled experimentation within regulatory parameters
- Government-guided selection of permitted innovations
- Lower probability of regulatory surprises but also breakthrough innovations
Long-Term Strategic Consequences
1. Global Financial Architecture Reshaping
This regulatory divergence may fundamentally reshape global financial architecture:
US Position: Emerges as the global hub for crypto innovation and high-risk digital asset activities Singapore Position: Becomes the “Switzerland of crypto” – highly regulated, premium, institutionally focused
2. Bank Competitive Dynamics Evolution
US Banks: Must move quickly to capture market share before regulations potentially tighten again Singapore Banks: Can build sustainable competitive moats through regulatory compliance expertise
The Strategic Paradox
The ultimate paradox is that both regulatory approaches may prove simultaneously correct for their respective markets:
US Success Metrics: Market share growth, innovation speed, capital attraction Singapore Success Metrics: Regulatory stability, institutional trust, systemic risk management
Conclusion: Two Paths to Digital Asset Banking Dominance
The 2025 regulatory divergence between the US and Singapore represents more than policy differences—it’s the emergence of two fundamentally different models for digital asset banking integration.
The US model bets on market efficiency through regulatory simplicity, while Singapore bets on market stability through regulatory sophistication. Both approaches may succeed in their intended markets, creating a bifurcated global digital asset banking ecosystem where different institutions serve different risk appetites and regulatory preferences.
This divergence will likely persist, with each jurisdiction attracting the types of institutions and capital that align with their regulatory philosophy, ultimately creating two parallel but interconnected digital asset banking universes.
The Great Divide: A Tale of Two Banking Worlds
Chapter 1: The Meeting
The video call flickered to life at precisely 9:00 AM Singapore time, 8:00 PM New York time. Sarah Chen, Head of Digital Assets at DBS Bank, adjusted her webcam as Marcus Rodriguez, Chief Innovation Officer at JPMorgan Chase, appeared on her screen. Between them lay not just 12 time zones, but what had become the greatest regulatory chasm in modern banking history.
“Sarah, I have to ask,” Marcus began, his voice carrying the exhaustion of another late-night strategy session, “how are you handling the DTSP compliance deadline? June 30th is breathing down everyone’s necks here in the industry press.”
Sarah smiled, though it didn’t reach her eyes. “We’ve been preparing for two years, Marcus. Every process documented, every transaction monitored, every client verified three times over. The question is—how are you handling your sudden freedom?”
Marcus laughed, but it sounded hollow through the compressed audio. “Freedom? You call it freedom when overnight, every crypto startup in the world is suddenly our competitor? SAB 121’s gone, and now it’s the Wild West again.”
Chapter 2: The Divergent Paths
Three months earlier – March 2025
Sarah had stood in the gleaming boardroom of DBS’s Marina Bay headquarters, facing a room full of nervous executives. Outside, Singapore’s skyline pulsed with the controlled energy of a city-state that had built itself on precision.
“Ladies and gentlemen,” she announced, “MAS has made it clear. We’re not just complying with DTSP regulations—we’re embracing them. While our American counterparts celebrate deregulation, we’re building the Fort Knox of digital asset banking.”
The Head of Risk Management, Alan Lim, shifted uncomfortably. “Sarah, the compliance costs are staggering. We’re talking about hiring fifty new compliance officers, implementing new AML systems, and maintaining capital reserves that could fund a small nation’s budget.”
“And that,” Sarah replied, “is exactly why we’ll win. Every dollar we spend on compliance is a dollar our competitors can’t afford to match.”
Meanwhile, in Manhattan
Marcus paced his corner office, watching the Hudson River through floor-to-ceiling windows. His phone buzzed with yet another message from a fintech startup seeking partnership.
“Ridiculous,” he muttered to his deputy, Jennifer Walsh. “Six months ago, these crypto companies wouldn’t return our calls because we couldn’t custody their assets without destroying our balance sheet. Now they’re all beating down our door.”
Jennifer pulled up the latest market analysis on her tablet. “The numbers are staggering, Marcus. With SAB 121 gone, we could capture a $200 billion custody market within eighteen months. But…”
“But?”
“The risk models are all over the place. We’re moving fast, but we’re moving blind. Meanwhile, Singapore banks are building bunkers, and we’re building race cars.”
Chapter 3: The First Casualties
June 15, 2025 – Singapore
The email arrived at 6:47 AM local time, marked urgent and confidential. CryptoTech Solutions, a mid-sized digital asset service provider that had operated from Singapore for three years serving international clients, was shutting down.
“Effective immediately, we are ceasing all operations,” the CEO’s message read. “Despite our best efforts, we cannot meet the DTSP licensing requirements. The compliance costs exceed our annual revenue by 300%.”
Sarah forwarded the email to her team with a single word: “Opportunity.”
By noon, she was on a call with CryptoTech’s biggest client, a family office in Hong Kong managing $2 billion in traditional and digital assets.
“Mr. Liu,” she said, “I understand CryptoTech’s closure has left you in a difficult position. DBS can offer full DTSP-compliant services by July 1st.”
The family office principal’s relief was audible. “Sarah, we’ve been dreading this conversation for months. But your fees…”
“Are exactly what they need to be to guarantee security, compliance, and continuity. We’re not the cheapest option, Mr. Liu. We’re the only option that guarantees you’ll still be in business five years from now.”
The same day – New York
Marcus received a very different kind of call. Three crypto startups had just signed partnership agreements with JPMorgan in a single morning, bringing $500 million in assets under management.
“It’s like Christmas morning every day,” Jennifer reported. “But Marcus, I’m getting worried about our risk exposure. These partnerships are moving faster than our due diligence can keep up.”
Marcus nodded grimly. “The regulatory environment says we can move fast. The market demands we move fast. But…”
“But fast and safe don’t always align,” Jennifer finished.
“Exactly. And meanwhile, Sarah’s team in Singapore is probably sleeping soundly knowing every single client has been vetted, every transaction monitored, every risk calculated to the third decimal point.”
Chapter 4: The Crisis Point
September 2025
The crisis began with a single transaction flag in DBS’s monitoring system. $50 million in Bitcoin moving through multiple wallets, each step carefully designed to obscure the trail. But Sarah’s team had built their system to catch exactly this kind of pattern.
“It’s money laundering,” confirmed the head of financial crimes, Lisa Tan. “Classic layering technique, but sophisticated. If we were operating under looser standards…”
“We’re not,” Sarah cut her off. “That’s the point. File the STR, freeze the accounts, and coordinate with MAS immediately.”
The investigation revealed a network spanning six countries, using multiple crypto service providers. DBS was the only institution that had flagged the activity.
The same week – New York
Marcus stared at the Wall Street Journal headline on his monitor: “Major Crypto Money Laundering Ring Exposed by Singapore Bank While US Institutions Miss Red Flags.”
The article was devastating. The same criminal network that DBS had stopped had successfully moved $200 million through three different US financial institutions, all of whom had failed to detect the pattern.
“How did we miss this?” Jennifer asked, though they both knew the answer.
“Speed over safety,” Marcus replied. “We’ve been so focused on capturing market share that we optimized for convenience, not compliance.”
His phone rang. The caller ID showed Sarah Chen.
“Marcus,” her voice was professional but not unkind. “I saw the news. Are you okay?”
“Professionally bruised, personally mortified. Your system caught what ours missed.”
“Our system cost us $100 million to build and requires sixty full-time staff to operate. Your system was designed to move fast and capture market share. Different tools for different strategies.”
Marcus was quiet for a long moment. “Sarah, be honest with me. Do you think we chose the wrong path?”
Chapter 5: The Reckoning
December 2025
The year-end numbers told two very different stories.
In Singapore, DBS reported digital asset revenue growth of 340%, with zero compliance violations, zero money laundering incidents, and a client retention rate of 98%. However, they served only 127 institutional clients, each paying premium fees for premium service.
In New York, JPMorgan reported digital asset revenue growth of 1,200%, serving over 3,000 clients across retail and institutional markets. However, they faced $50 million in regulatory fines, had lost two major institutional clients due to security concerns, and spent 40% of their digital asset revenue on incident response and remediation.
Sarah and Marcus met in person for the first time that year at the Global Banking Summit in Davos. Over Swiss coffee in a quiet corner of the conference center, they reflected on their divergent journeys.
“You know what I realized?” Marcus said, stirring his coffee absently. “We weren’t really competing. We were building entirely different businesses for entirely different worlds.”
Sarah nodded. “My regulators forced us to build a Rolls-Royce. Yours allowed you to build a Formula 1 car. Both serve their purpose, but try to drive a Formula 1 car to the grocery store…”
“Or take a Rolls-Royce to a race track,” Marcus finished. “But here’s what I don’t understand, Sarah. Which one of us is right?”
Sarah was quiet for a long moment, watching the snow fall on the Swiss Alps through the conference center’s windows.
“Maybe that’s the wrong question, Marcus. Maybe we’re both right, for our markets. Your clients wanted speed and access. Mine wanted security and compliance. The market provided what the regulators allowed, and the regulators allowed what their citizens demanded.”
Chapter 6: The New Reality
January 2026
A year after the great regulatory divergence began, the global financial landscape had fundamentally reshifted. Singapore had become the “Switzerland of crypto” – expensive, exclusive, and absolutely trustworthy. The US had become the “Nevada of crypto” – fast, accessible, and willing to take risks.
International family offices and sovereign wealth funds increasingly banked their digital assets in Singapore. Retail investors and crypto startups flocked to American institutions. Hedge funds used both: Singapore banks for their core holdings, US banks for their trading operations.
Sarah’s team had pioneered new international compliance standards that other regulated jurisdictions began adopting. Marcus’s team had developed rapid-deployment crypto services that became the template for emerging markets.
In her final email of 2025, Sarah wrote to Marcus:
“You asked which one of us was right. I think we both were, and I think we both were wrong. Right for our contexts, wrong to think there was only one way forward. The world is big enough for both a tortoise and a hare, as long as they remember they’re not racing toward the same finish line.”
Marcus replied within the hour:
“Beautifully put, Sarah. Here’s to 2026, and to the realization that sometimes the greatest competition is the one where everybody wins by playing completely different games.”
Epilogue: Five Years Later
2030
The documentary filmmaker adjusted her camera as Sarah and Marcus sat across from each other once again, this time in a neutral venue – the newly opened Global Digital Assets Museum in Geneva.
“So,” the filmmaker asked, “looking back, do you think the 2025 regulatory divergence was inevitable?”
Sarah and Marcus exchanged glances, five years of perspective having mellowed the intensity of those early days.
“I think,” Sarah began, “that every financial system ultimately reflects the values of the society it serves. Singapore values stability, predictability, and state oversight. America values innovation, competition, and market freedom.”
Marcus nodded. “And the beautiful thing is that both systems worked. They just worked for different people, in different ways, for different purposes.”
“The mistake,” Sarah continued, “would have been trying to force one model onto the other. America couldn’t have adopted Singapore’s regulatory intensity without stifling its innovation culture. Singapore couldn’t have adopted America’s regulatory flexibility without compromising its stability promise.”
The filmmaker pressed: “But surely one approach was objectively better?”
Marcus laughed. “You know what we learned? There’s no such thing as objectively better in financial regulation. There’s only better for specific goals, specific risks, specific societies.”
“The global financial system is stronger,” Sarah concluded, “because it has both approaches. Clients self-select into the regulatory environment that matches their risk tolerance and needs. The world has choices.”
As the interview concluded and the cameras stopped rolling, Sarah and Marcus walked together through the museum’s exhibits showcasing the evolution of digital asset banking.
“Do you ever wonder,” Marcus asked, pausing in front of a display showing the original SAB 121 guidance document alongside Singapore’s first DTSP license, “what would have happened if we’d made different choices?”
Sarah smiled. “Every day. But then I remember that we didn’t just make choices for ourselves. We made choices for our institutions, our regulators, our societies. And maybe, just maybe, we made the right choices for who we were meant to serve.”
They parted ways at the museum’s entrance, each returning to their respective worlds – worlds that had grown different by design, stronger through diversity, and wiser through the recognition that in the complex ecosystem of global finance, there was room for more than one way to be right.
Maxthon
In an age where the digital world is in constant flux and our interactions online are ever-evolving, the importance of prioritising individuals as they navigate the expansive internet cannot be overstated. The myriad of elements that shape our online experiences calls for a thoughtful approach to selecting web browsers—one that places a premium on security and user privacy. Amidst the multitude of browsers vying for users’ loyalty, Maxthon emerges as a standout choice, providing a trustworthy solution to these pressing concerns, all without any cost to the user.
Maxthon, with its advanced features, boasts a comprehensive suite of built-in tools designed to enhance your online privacy. Among these tools are a highly effective ad blocker and a range of anti-tracking mechanisms, each meticulously crafted to fortify your digital sanctuary. This browser has carved out a niche for itself, particularly with its seamless compatibility with Windows 11, further solidifying its reputation in an increasingly competitive market.
In a crowded landscape of web browsers, Maxthon has forged a distinct identity through its unwavering dedication to offering a secure and private browsing experience. Fully aware of the myriad threats lurking in the vast expanse of cyberspace, Maxthon works tirelessly to safeguard your personal information. Utilizing state-of-the-art encryption technology, it ensures that your sensitive data remains protected and confidential throughout your online adventures.
What truly sets Maxthon apart is its commitment to enhancing user privacy during every moment spent online. Each feature of this browser has been meticulously designed with the user’s privacy in mind. Its powerful ad-blocking capabilities work diligently to eliminate unwanted advertisements, while its comprehensive anti-tracking measures effectively reduce the presence of invasive scripts that could disrupt your browsing enjoyment. As a result, users can traverse the web with newfound confidence and safety.
Moreover, Maxthon’s incognito mode provides an extra layer of security, granting users enhanced anonymity while engaging in their online pursuits. This specialised mode not only conceals your browsing habits but also ensures that your digital footprint remains minimal, allowing for an unobtrusive and liberating internet experience. With Maxthon as your ally in the digital realm, you can explore the vastness of the internet with peace of mind, knowing that your privacy is being prioritised every step of the way.