Select Page

Analysis of the 2026 School Canteen Transformation

Executive Summary

Singapore is embarking on a significant transformation of its school meal system, with 13 schools transitioning to a central kitchen model in January 2026. This shift represents a fundamental reimagining of how students eat at school, moving from traditional canteen stalls to pre-ordered bento meals and digitally-enabled food collection systems. This analysis examines the multifaceted implications of this change for Singapore’s education system, food industry, and society.


1. The Crisis That Sparked Change

The School Canteen Operator Shortage

The implementation of the central kitchen model is not merely an innovation—it is a response to a critical shortage of school canteen stall operators. This shortage reflects deeper structural challenges in Singapore’s food service industry:

Labour Market Pressures

  • An aging workforce unwilling to take on physically demanding canteen work
  • Long working hours (typically 6am to 3pm) with limited rest periods
  • Relatively low profit margins requiring high volume to be viable
  • Competition from food delivery platforms offering more flexible working arrangements

Economic Viability Concerns

  • Rising ingredient and rental costs
  • Strict price controls on school meals limiting profitability
  • Student population fluctuations affecting revenue predictability
  • Investment requirements for equipment and stall setup

Operational Complexities

  • Stringent Health Promotion Board guidelines
  • Regular inspections and compliance requirements
  • Difficulty managing inventory and waste for small-scale operations
  • Limited economies of scale for individual stall operators

The central kitchen model addresses these challenges by consolidating operations, professionalizing management, and creating a more sustainable business model.


2. The Three-Caterer Ecosystem

Chang Cheng Holdings: The Coffee Shop Chain Enters Education

Chang Cheng Holdings brings significant advantages to the table:

Operational Strengths:

  • Extensive experience managing the Chang Cheng Mee Wah coffee shop chain
  • Established supply chain networks and vendor relationships
  • Proven food safety and quality control systems
  • Financial stability to invest in specialized school meal infrastructure

The Chang Cheng Model:

  • 13 daily meal choices (9 halal, 3 vegetarian)
  • Weekly menu rotation with monthly cycles
  • 18-hour advance ordering window via AmiApp
  • Six-hour cooking-to-delivery timeline
  • Food locker retrieval system with ez-link card integration
  • Backup options: extra bentos, snacks, dim sum at drinks stall, vending machines

Innovation Approach: The company employs a dietitian working with chefs to enhance vegetable appeal—using colorful vegetables and flavorful sauces. This addresses the perennial challenge of getting children to eat healthily.

Gourmetz: The Flexible Pre-Order Specialist

Service Differentiation:

  • 5-6 daily mains mixing local and international cuisine
  • Termly menu changes maintaining freshness and variety
  • Extended ordering window (up to 3 months in advance)
  • Next-day ordering option (before noon, one working day prior)
  • Web-based GOe Meals portal for convenience
  • Safety net of extra meals for forgotten orders

Strategic Positioning: Gourmetz caters to parents who plan ahead, offering maximum flexibility for busy families managing multiple schedules.

Wilmar: The Hybrid Model Pioneer

Wilmar’s approach uniquely blends traditional and modern:

Dual Service Strategy:

  • Live station stall offering immediate, on-site cooked options
  • Pre-packed meal system for planned orders
  • Economy rice as permanent offering
  • Rotating cuisine options for variety
  • Minimum 3-day advance ordering requirement
  • Two-week advance menu publication

Target Demographics: The live station appeals to upper-primary and secondary students preferring immediate choice, while pre-packed meals target lower-primary students whose parents want meal control.


3. The Technology Infrastructure

Digital Transformation of School Dining

The central kitchen model is fundamentally enabled by technology:

Mobile and Web Platforms:

  • Chang Cheng’s AmiApp
  • Gourmetz’s GOe Meals web portal
  • Wilmar’s designated platform
  • Parent-friendly interfaces for advance ordering
  • Payment integration systems

Smart Collection Systems:

  • Food locker infrastructure in schools
  • Ez-link card integration for contactless retrieval
  • Temperature-controlled storage maintaining food quality
  • Individual compartment assignments
  • Hygiene and security benefits over open collection

Data Analytics Opportunities:

  • Meal preference tracking informing menu development
  • Demand forecasting reducing waste
  • Nutritional monitoring across student populations
  • Parental engagement metrics
  • Predictive ordering patterns

The Cold Chain Challenge

Maintaining food quality from central kitchen to school locker is critical:

Chang Cheng’s Six-Hour Window: Meals cooked six hours before delivery and kept warm throughout present logistical challenges:

  • Temperature maintenance preventing bacterial growth
  • Food quality preservation (texture, moisture, flavor)
  • Packaging technology ensuring freshness
  • Transportation coordination across multiple schools
  • Energy consumption for heating systems

This compressed timeline requires military-grade logistics coordination.


4. Nutritional and Health Implications

Health Promotion Board Compliance

All caterers must adhere to strict guidelines:

Mandatory Requirements:

  • No deep-fried items
  • Wholegrain rice usage
  • Healthier-choice ingredients
  • Balanced bento composition: wholegrains, vegetables, proteins, fruit

The Nutrition Revolution: These requirements represent Singapore’s commitment to childhood health, addressing:

  • Rising childhood obesity rates
  • Development of lifelong healthy eating habits
  • Reduction of non-communicable disease risk factors
  • Educational integration of nutrition awareness

The Vegetable Victory

The article’s anecdote of Primary 2 student Brent Go finishing all his vegetables—including carrots—is significant:

Psychological Factors:

  • Attractive presentation increasing appeal
  • Flavorful sauces making vegetables palatable
  • Bento format creating visual variety
  • Pre-portioned servings setting consumption expectations

Long-term Health Impact: Early positive experiences with vegetables can establish preferences lasting into adulthood, potentially reducing Singapore’s burden of diet-related diseases.

Dietary Diversity and Inclusion

Religious and Dietary Accommodation:

  • Nine halal options daily from Chang Cheng
  • Three vegetarian choices addressing plant-based diets
  • Allergen management through centralized production
  • Cultural sensitivity in menu design

Expansion of Palates: Students like Emma Rose Muhamad Fyruz, previously limited to Maggi goreng, will access diverse options including Japanese curry chicken rice, spaghetti bolognese, and chicken tikka—expanding cultural food literacy.


5. Economic Analysis

Pricing Structure and Affordability

MOE Price Guidelines: The $1.80 to under $4 price range maintains school meal affordability while enabling caterer viability.

Value Proposition Analysis:

Low End ($1.80-$2.50):

  • Basic bento options
  • Staple ingredients
  • High-volume items
  • Accessible to all income levels

Mid Range ($2.50-$3.50):

  • Premium proteins
  • More elaborate preparations
  • International cuisine options
  • Majority of offerings

High End ($3.50-$4.00):

  • Specialty meals
  • Higher ingredient costs
  • Occasional indulgences
  • Still affordable by hawker center standards

Economic Efficiency Through Centralization

Economies of Scale:

  • Bulk ingredient purchasing reducing unit costs
  • Centralized equipment investment
  • Specialized staff efficiency
  • Standardized processes minimizing waste
  • Predictable demand through pre-orders

Cost Comparison: Traditional canteen stalls face high per-unit costs due to:

  • Small-scale purchasing
  • Individual equipment investments
  • Variable daily demand
  • Food waste from unsold items
  • Labor inefficiency during slow periods

Central kitchens spread fixed costs across thousands of meals daily.

Impact on Singapore’s Food Service Industry

Market Consolidation: The shift favors large, established operators with:

  • Capital for infrastructure investment
  • Professional management systems
  • Supply chain sophistication
  • Quality control capabilities

Implications:

  • Reduced opportunities for small-scale hawker entrepreneurs
  • Professionalization of school food service
  • Potential blueprint for other institutional dining (hospitals, eldercare)
  • Technology adoption accelerating industry transformation

6. Social and Cultural Impact

The Death of the Traditional School Canteen

Singapore’s school canteens have been social institutions:

What’s Being Lost:

  • Spontaneous meal choices reflecting daily cravings
  • Social interaction with familiar canteen vendors
  • Immediate sensory experience of food preparation
  • Informal financial literacy (handling cash, making change)
  • Flexibility to share or swap food with friends
  • The ritual of queuing and canteen culture

What’s Being Gained:

  • Guaranteed meal availability (no sold-out frustration)
  • Parental oversight and control
  • Nutritional consistency
  • Reduced food waste
  • Time efficiency (no queuing)
  • Hygiene improvements

Parental Control vs. Student Autonomy

The 18-Hour Pre-Order Window: Chang Cheng’s requirement means parents must plan meals by 6pm the previous day for next-day lunch. This creates:

Benefits:

  • Ensured nutrition meeting parental standards
  • Budget control and meal planning
  • Reduced unhealthy impulse choices
  • Dietary restriction management

Concerns:

  • Reduced student autonomy and decision-making practice
  • Inflexibility for changing appetites or circumstances
  • Potential conflicts between parent choices and student preferences
  • Dependency on parental organization and technology access

The Digital Divide Risk: Families lacking smartphone access, internet connectivity, or digital literacy may face disadvantages, requiring schools to provide alternative ordering mechanisms.

Social Equity Considerations

Meal Disparity Visibility: When all students collect pre-ordered meals from lockers, dietary differences become less visible than traditional canteen purchases, potentially reducing:

  • Socioeconomic stigma
  • Peer pressure around food choices
  • Bullying related to meal types

However, the system may create new divisions:

  • Those whose parents pre-order vs. those buying extra bentos
  • Access to backup options requiring additional payment
  • Digital capability disparities

7. Operational and Logistical Challenges

The Forgotten Meal Problem

Backup Systems Required: All three caterers acknowledge students will forget to pre-order:

Chang Cheng: Extra bentos, snacks, dim sum at drinks stall; vending machines

Gourmetz: Extra meals prepared daily

Wilmar: Live station providing immediate options

The Real Cost: These backup systems require:

  • Additional food preparation beyond pre-orders
  • Potential waste from unused backup meals
  • Staffing for immediate service
  • Pricing complexity

Multi-School Coordination Complexity

Logistical Choreography: Each caterer serving multiple schools must:

  • Coordinate simultaneous meal readiness across locations
  • Manage varied meal times (primary vs. secondary school schedules)
  • Route delivery vehicles efficiently
  • Handle school-specific dietary requirements or restrictions
  • Maintain communication channels with each school administration

Weather Disruption: Singapore’s tropical climate poses risks:

  • Heavy rain delays affecting delivery schedules
  • Temperature fluctuations impacting food safety
  • School closures or schedule changes requiring rapid adjustment

Food Safety at Scale

Critical Control Points:

  • Central kitchen hygiene standards
  • Temperature monitoring throughout delivery
  • Food locker sanitation and maintenance
  • Packaging integrity verification
  • Traceability systems for contamination incidents

Regulatory Oversight: The Singapore Food Agency and Ministry of Education must ensure:

  • Regular inspections of central kitchen facilities
  • Transportation vehicle standards
  • School-site storage compliance
  • Rapid response protocols for food safety incidents
  • Public confidence maintenance

8. Educational and Developmental Impact

Nutrition Education Integration

Teachable Moments: The bento format offers educational opportunities:

  • Visual demonstration of balanced meal composition
  • Portion size awareness
  • Food group recognition
  • Cultural food diversity appreciation

Curriculum Integration: Schools can leverage the system for:

  • Science lessons on nutrition and digestion
  • Math applications in meal planning and budgeting
  • Social studies exploring food cultures
  • Environmental education on waste reduction

Life Skills Development Questions

Skills Potentially Diminished:

  • Independent decision-making about food choices
  • Financial management (handling lunch money)
  • Negotiation and social skills in canteen queues
  • Adaptation to food availability constraints
  • Immediate gratification delay

Skills Potentially Enhanced:

  • Digital literacy through ordering platforms
  • Planning and organization (remembering to order)
  • Following systems and procedures
  • Technology integration in daily life

The Balance Question: Educators and parents must consider whether efficiency and nutrition justify reduced opportunities for practicing autonomy and decision-making.


9. Environmental Sustainability Analysis

Packaging and Waste Concerns

Single-Use Container Reality: Pre-packed bentos require:

  • Disposable containers for each meal
  • Packaging materials for food separation
  • Utensils and napkins
  • Protective outer packaging for delivery

Environmental Impact:

  • Thousands of containers daily across 13 schools
  • Plastic waste generation
  • Carbon footprint of container production
  • Landfill burden post-consumption

Potential Mitigation:

  • Biodegradable or compostable packaging materials
  • Reusable container systems with deposit schemes
  • Recycling infrastructure at schools
  • Portion control reducing overall food consumption

Food Waste Reduction Benefits

Traditional Canteen Waste: Individual stalls often face:

  • Overpreparation to avoid running out
  • Limited shelf life of prepared foods
  • End-of-day disposal of unsold items
  • Difficulty forecasting demand

Central Kitchen Advantages:

  • Pre-order system enabling precise production quantities
  • Better demand forecasting through data analytics
  • Centralized inventory management reducing spoilage
  • Standardized portions minimizing plate waste

Net Environmental Impact: The trade-off between increased packaging waste and reduced food waste requires careful monitoring and reporting.

Carbon Footprint Considerations

Transportation Emissions:

  • Daily delivery vehicles traveling to multiple schools
  • Fuel consumption for temperature-controlled transport
  • Urban congestion contribution

Energy Usage:

  • Central kitchen cooking equipment at scale
  • Heating systems maintaining food temperature
  • Refrigeration for ingredient storage
  • Food locker climate control

Comparative Analysis Needed: Whether centralized production is more energy-efficient than multiple school-site kitchens requires life-cycle assessment.


10. The Pilot Program Legacy

Yusof Ishak Secondary School: The Proof of Concept

2022 Pilot Insights: The article mentions the pilot managed by caterer Sats but provides limited detail. Key questions:

  • Student satisfaction metrics
  • Nutritional outcome improvements
  • Operational challenges encountered
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • Parent and teacher feedback

Lessons Informing 2026 Rollout: The three-year gap between pilot and expansion suggests:

  • Refinement of operational procedures
  • Technology platform development
  • Regulatory framework establishment
  • Caterer selection process completion

Why Three Different Caterers? Rather than scaling the single pilot operator, MOE selected three distinct providers, suggesting:

  • Risk diversification strategy
  • Competitive pressure maintaining quality
  • Testing varied operational models
  • Prevention of monopolistic control

11. Broader Implications for Singapore

A Model for Institutional Food Service

Scalability Beyond Schools: If successful, the central kitchen model could extend to:

Healthcare Facilities:

  • Hospital patient meals
  • Long-term care facilities
  • Rehabilitation centers

Government Institutions:

  • Civil service canteens
  • Military bases
  • Correctional facilities

Corporate Settings:

  • Office building cafeterias
  • Industrial park food services
  • Convention centers

Singapore’s Smart Nation Integration

Data-Driven Governance: The system generates valuable data for:

  • Childhood nutrition surveillance
  • Food preference trends informing health policy
  • Supply chain optimization
  • Predictive modeling for food security planning

Technology Infrastructure: Integration with existing systems:

  • Ez-link card ecosystem
  • Digital payment platforms
  • Smart building management
  • IoT sensor networks

Food Security Considerations

Centralization Risks:

  • Concentration of critical food supply infrastructure
  • Vulnerability to single-point failures
  • Potential disruption from public health emergencies
  • Dependency on specific suppliers

Resilience Measures:

  • Multiple caterer strategy providing redundancy
  • Backup supply chain arrangements
  • Emergency protocol development
  • Regular business continuity testing

12. Stakeholder Perspectives

Students: The End Users

Primary School Students (Lower Primary):

  • Limited autonomy but protected from poor choices
  • Exposure to nutritious foods they might otherwise avoid
  • Reduced social pressure around food
  • Dependence on parental organization

Primary School Students (Upper Primary):

  • Desire for choice and independence
  • Frustration with pre-planned meals
  • Appreciation for variety and quality
  • Learning to navigate digital systems

Secondary School Students:

  • Greater need for autonomy and flexibility
  • Varied appetites and dietary preferences
  • Social dynamics around food choices
  • Potential resistance to parental control

Parents: The Decision Makers

Working Parents:

  • Convenience of advance planning
  • Assurance of nutritional quality
  • Control over food expenses
  • Time savings from eliminated daily lunch money transactions

Health-Conscious Parents:

  • Satisfaction with HPB guidelines
  • Ability to monitor and influence food choices
  • Reduced worry about unhealthy options
  • Appreciation for vegetable incorporation strategies

Concerned Parents:

  • Worries about reduced child autonomy
  • Questions about food freshness and quality
  • Digital literacy challenges
  • Cost compared to home-packed lunches

Teachers and School Administrators

Operational Benefits:

  • Reduced canteen management responsibilities
  • Decreased food safety liability
  • Fewer student complaints about meal availability
  • Simplified vendor coordination

Concerns:

  • Handling students who forget meals
  • Managing technology integration
  • Addressing dietary emergencies or restrictions
  • Maintaining backup plans

Traditional Canteen Operators

The Displaced Vendors: For hawkers and small operators pushed out of schools:

  • Loss of stable, recession-resistant income
  • Difficulty transitioning to other food service roles
  • Aging workforce facing unemployment
  • End of traditional business model

Limited Transition Support: Questions about government assistance for affected operators remain unaddressed.


13. International Context and Comparisons

Global School Meal Models

Japan: The Gold Standard

  • School lunches served to 99% of elementary and 89% of junior high students
  • Prepared on-site in school kitchens
  • Eaten in classrooms with teachers
  • Strong emphasis on nutrition education
  • Students serve and clean up, teaching responsibility

United Kingdom: The Jamie Oliver Effect

  • Celebrity chef activism improving school meal standards
  • Combination of contracted caterers and on-site cooking
  • Free school meal programs for low-income families
  • Ongoing debates about quality and funding

United States: Federally Subsidized System

  • National School Lunch Program serving 30 million children daily
  • Mix of on-site preparation and central kitchens
  • Persistent issues with nutrition quality and food waste
  • Socioeconomic disparities in meal quality

Singapore’s Unique Approach:

  • High-quality, affordable meals without means-testing
  • Technology-enabled pre-ordering system
  • Strict nutritional standards
  • Private sector delivery with public oversight

What Singapore Can Learn

From Japan:

  • Educational integration maximizing learning value
  • Student participation building responsibility
  • Communal eating strengthening social bonds

From International Challenges:

  • Maintaining quality at scale
  • Preventing cost inflation over time
  • Ensuring equity across socioeconomic groups
  • Balancing efficiency with student experience

14. Future Scenarios and Predictions

Scenario 1: Smooth Expansion (Optimistic)

2026-2027:

  • Initial adjustment period with minor hiccups
  • Student and parent satisfaction high
  • Nutritional improvements measurable
  • Operational efficiency demonstrated

2028-2030:

  • Expansion to additional 50-100 schools
  • Technology platforms mature and integrate
  • New caterers enter market
  • Cost per meal decreases through economies of scale

2031 and Beyond:

  • Majority of Singapore schools adopt central kitchen model
  • Traditional canteens become rare exceptions
  • Model exported internationally
  • Integration with national health initiatives

Scenario 2: Significant Challenges (Realistic)

Early Obstacles:

  • Technology platform glitches frustrating parents
  • Food quality complaints during adjustment
  • Forgotten meal situations overwhelming backup systems
  • Some schools requesting return to traditional model

Adaptation Required:

  • System modifications based on feedback
  • Enhanced backup provisions
  • Improved parent communication and training
  • Flexible policies accommodating special circumstances

Stabilization:

  • Hybrid models emerging (mix of central kitchen and traditional stalls)
  • Varied adoption rates across school types
  • Continuous improvement based on data analysis

Scenario 3: Partial Retreat (Pessimistic)

Implementation Problems:

  • Widespread dissatisfaction from students
  • Logistical failures affecting meal delivery
  • Food safety incidents undermining confidence
  • Higher costs than projected

Policy Reversal:

  • Some schools reverting to traditional canteens
  • Government increasing subsidies to attract stall operators
  • Central kitchen model limited to specific school types
  • Rethinking of approach

15. Policy Recommendations

For the Ministry of Education

Monitoring and Evaluation:

  • Establish comprehensive metrics for success measurement
  • Regular surveys of students, parents, and teachers
  • Nutritional outcome tracking
  • Cost-benefit analysis

Flexibility Provisions:

  • Allow schools to maintain some traditional elements
  • Accommodate special dietary needs proactively
  • Provide alternatives for students facing difficulties

Support Systems:

  • Digital literacy programs for parents
  • School-based assistance for forgotten meals
  • Clear communication channels for feedback

For Caterers

Quality Assurance:

  • Rigorous testing of delivery systems before full implementation
  • Diverse menu development with cultural sensitivity
  • Transparent ingredient sourcing and nutrition information
  • Responsive customer service

Innovation:

  • Sustainable packaging solutions
  • Customization options within operational constraints
  • Engagement programs (cooking classes, facility tours)

For Schools

Community Engagement:

  • Parent education sessions about the new system
  • Student involvement in menu feedback
  • Teacher training on supporting transition
  • Clear protocols for problem resolution

16. Critical Questions for Further Investigation

Unanswered Questions

  1. What specific feedback from the 2022 pilot informed the 2026 expansion?
    • Success metrics achieved
    • Problems encountered and solutions
    • Why three years between pilot and expansion?
  2. How will the system handle dietary emergencies and allergies?
    • Communication protocols
    • Substitute meal procedures
    • Liability frameworks
  3. What happens to displaced canteen operators?
    • Retraining programs
    • Financial assistance
    • Alternative employment opportunities
  4. What are the exact costs to parents?
    • Average monthly expense
    • Comparison to previous canteen spending
    • Hidden costs (technology requirements, forgotten meal penalties)
  5. How will success be measured?
    • Nutritional metrics
    • Student satisfaction indices
    • Academic performance correlations
    • Cost efficiency benchmarks
  6. What contingency plans exist for system failures?
    • Delivery disruptions
    • Technology outages
    • Caterer business failures
    • Public health emergencies

Conclusion: A Transformation with Far-Reaching Consequences

The central kitchen model represents far more than a change in how school meals are delivered—it is a fundamental reimagining of childhood nutrition, educational experience, and the role of technology in daily life.

The Positive Vision

If implemented successfully, the system could:

  • Significantly improve childhood nutrition across Singapore
  • Reduce health disparities through universal access to quality meals
  • Demonstrate the power of technology to solve social challenges
  • Provide a model for other institutional food service transformations
  • Generate valuable data informing public health policy

The Cautionary Notes

However, risks must be acknowledged:

  • Reduction in student autonomy and decision-making practice
  • Loss of traditional social and cultural elements of school dining
  • Technology-dependent system vulnerable to failures
  • Environmental concerns about packaging waste
  • Concentration risks in food supply infrastructure
  • Potential erosion of small-scale food service entrepreneurship

The Path Forward

Success requires:

  • Vigilant monitoring with transparent reporting of outcomes
  • Adaptive flexibility to modify systems based on real-world experience
  • Stakeholder engagement ensuring voices of students, parents, and educators shape implementation
  • Sustainability focus addressing environmental impacts proactively
  • Equity safeguards ensuring no child is disadvantaged by the transition

As Singapore’s 13 schools embark on this journey in January 2026, the world will be watching. The lessons learned will inform not only Singapore’s own future expansion but also educational policy globally as nations grapple with similar challenges of ensuring nutritious, affordable, and sustainable school meals for all children.

The central kitchen model is not just about feeding students—it is about shaping the future of childhood nutrition, defining the balance between efficiency and autonomy, and demonstrating whether technology can enhance rather than diminish the human experience of something as fundamental as sharing a meal.


This analysis is based on publicly available information as of October 2025. Ongoing monitoring and evaluation will be essential to understanding the true impact of this significant policy shift.

Maxthon

Maxthon browser Windows 11 support

Maxthon has set out on an ambitious journey aimed at significantly bolstering the security of web applications, fueled by a resolute commitment to safeguarding users and their confidential data. At the heart of this initiative lies a collection of sophisticated encryption protocols, which act as a robust barrier for the information exchanged between individuals and various online services. Every interaction—be it the sharing of passwords or personal information—is protected within these encrypted channels, effectively preventing unauthorised access attempts from intruders.

Maxthon private browser for online privacyThis meticulous emphasis on encryption marks merely the initial phase of Maxthon’s extensive security framework. Acknowledging that cyber threats are constantly evolving, Maxthon adopts a forward-thinking approach to user protection. The browser is engineered to adapt to emerging challenges, incorporating regular updates that promptly address any vulnerabilities that may surface. Users are strongly encouraged to activate automatic updates as part of their cybersecurity regimen, ensuring they can seamlessly take advantage of the latest fixes without any hassle.

In today’s rapidly changing digital environment, Maxthon’s unwavering commitment to ongoing security enhancement signifies not only its responsibility toward users but also its firm dedication to nurturing trust in online engagements. With each new update rolled out, users can navigate the web with peace of mind, assured that their information is continuously safeguarded against ever-emerging threats lurking in cyberspace.