The Lola Daviet Homicide: A Case Study in Judicial Process, Political Weaponization, and the Criminology of Sensational Violence in Contemporary France
Abstract
The trial of Dahbia Benkired, which commenced in the Paris Assize Court in October 2025 for the rape, torture, and murder of 12-year-old Lola Daviet, represents a critical intersection of extreme deviance, judicial procedure, and intense socio-political polarization in France. This paper analyzes the case across three dimensions: the criminological severity of the crimes (highlighted by the forensic details and public outcry); the function of the specialized court in addressing these acts; and, significantly, the immediate and sustained political mobilization surrounding the defendant’s status as an Algerian national who had overstayed her visa. Drawing on the provided news documentation dating from the trial’s start, this analysis argues that the Lola Daviet homicide has been transmuted from a tragic criminal event into a potent symbol within the ongoing French debate on immigration and national security. The paper highlights the profound ethical tension between the victims’ desire for judicial closure (as encapsulated by the mother’s plea against exploitation) and the populist practice of leveraging moral panic for political gain, demonstrating a corrosive effect on public trust and the integrity of the judicial process.
- Introduction: The Anatomy of a National Tragedy
On October 17, 2025, the trial of Dahbia Benkired began in Paris, three years after the brutal 2022 killing of Lola Daviet, a crime that shocked France due to its sheer violence and the victim’s youth. Benkired, an Algerian national aged 27 at the time of the trial, faces charges of rape, torture, and murder. The discovery of Lola’s body in a trunk in the lobby of the apartment building where the victim’s parents worked as caretakers instantly elevated the case from a local tragedy to a subject of national scrutiny and emotional distress.
This academic examination uses the news reporting surrounding the opening of the trial as a primary source to explore the multifaceted impact of the event. The case is not merely a legal matter concerning the establishment of guilt but a powerful sociological phenomenon revealing deep fault lines within French society concerning crime, justice, victimhood, and, most prominently, immigration control.
The central thesis of this paper is that the Lola Daviet case serves as a critical lens through which to examine France’s judicial response to extreme violence, the moral hazard of political leveraging of tragedy, and the societal discourse surrounding the securitization of migration. We analyze the components of the case across four domains: the characteristics of the criminal violence, the judicial response, the political reaction, and the ethical standpoint of the victims’ family.
- Sensational Violence and the Criminology of Moral Panic
The details surrounding Lola Daviet’s death—including the use of scissors and a box cutter, the binding with duct tape around the face leading to death by asphyxia, and the transportation of the body in a trunk—place the crime firmly within the category of sensational violence. Such acts are characterized by their extreme brutality, the violation of societal taboos (especially the murder of a child), and their capacity to generate widespread fear and moral outrage.
2.1. Violation of the Sanctuary and the Innocent Victim
The finding of the body in the residential lobby—a space ostensibly protected and familiar, where the victim’s parents worked—violates the psychological boundary between the public sphere and private safety. Criminologically, the destruction of the ‘innocent victim’ archetype (the 12-year-old schoolgirl returning home) triggers intense societal anxiety. As noted by Stanley Cohen’s theory of moral panic, the identification of a clear and perceived “folk devil” (the perpetrator, Dahbia Benkired) allows for the rapid mobilization of public emotion and the demand for punitive action, often overshadowing nuanced debate about criminal justice policy (Cohen, 1972).
2.2. The Spectacle of the Trial
The trial proceedings themselves become a national spectacle, evidenced by the emotional scenes described in the report, such as the woman breaking down in tears upon the defendant’s entrance and the family’s unified T-shirt display (“You were the sun of our life, you will be the star of our nights”). This visual and emotional display underscores the judiciary’s role not just in determining guilt but in providing ritualized public catharsis for a deeply traumatized society.
- The Judicial Mechanism: The Paris Assize Court
The trial is being held before the Paris Assize Court (Cour d’Assises), the specialized judicial body in France responsible for judging the most serious felonies (crimes such as murder, rape, and torture). These courts feature a mix of professional magistrates and citizen jurors, reflecting the gravity and societal impact of the offenses being adjudicated.
3.1. Challenges of High-Profile Cases
The judicial process in the Assize Court faces significant challenges in cases of this magnitude. The requirement for objectivity and adherence to legal standards is tested by overwhelming public and media pressure, which often demands swift and maximal retribution. The investigation, which confirmed the forensic details—security footage showing Benkired leading the girl into the flat, the use of weapons, and the cause of death—must stand up to rigorous cross-examination, even as the public narrative of guilt is already fixed.
3.2. Seeking Justice and Recognition
For the Daviet family, the trial represents the final, torturous step toward judicial recognition of their daughter’s suffering. The presence of the family and their symbolic attire emphasize the focus on restorative justice and remembrance. The judicial outcome, whether conviction or acquittal, will be crucial in determining the perceived success of the state’s duty to protect its citizens and deliver closure.
- Immigration, Crime, and Political Weaponization
The most salient sociopolitical dimension of the Lola Daviet case is the defendant’s immigration status. Benkired was reportedly found to have overstayed a student visa and failed to comply with an Obligation de quitter le territoire français (OQTF), or notice to leave France. This detail immediately triggered a massive political response, particularly from the conservative and far-right sectors.
4.1. The Securitization of Migration
Politicians from these factions “seized on the case” to argue for stricter immigration law enforcement. This phenomenon aligns with the process of the ‘securitization of migration,’ where migration is framed not as an economic or social issue, but as an existential threat to national security and public order (Buzan et al., 1998).
The case provided a highly emotional, anecdotal foundation for broader political claims that existing immigration policies are dangerously lax. The failure to deport Benkired despite the OQTF became a narrative of state failure, transforming a singular, horrific criminal act into a generalized political indictment of immigration policy. This tactic uses the moral authority derived from the tragedy to justify policy changes aimed at border closure and harsher enforcement.
4.2. Populist Mobilization
The far-right utilization of the Lola Daviet case illustrates classic populist mobilization techniques. By linking a heinous act committed by an undocumented individual to the general population of immigrants, political actors create a powerful ‘us vs. them’ dichotomy. This form of political exploitation bypasses statistical reality concerning crime rates among immigrant populations, focusing instead on the emotional impact of a singular, horrifying event to drive public support for exclusionary policies.
- Victimology and the Ethics of Exploitation
Against the backdrop of political opportunism, the highly significant response of the victim’s family provides an essential counterpoint. The mother’s direct plea, urging “politicians to stop exploiting her daughter’s death,” establishes a crucial ethical boundary.
5.1. Secondary Victimization
The use of the tragedy by political figures risks what criminologists term ‘secondary victimization.’ While the primary victimization is the crime itself, secondary victimization occurs when the surviving family is further harmed by the response of institutions or the public sphere (Walklate, 2011). In this context, the family’s grief and quest for justice are overshadowed and appropriated for political narratives that do not align with their desire for private mourning and legal closure.
5.2. The Moral Claim of the Bereaved
The mother’s statement serves as a moral claim against the politicization of death. It attempts to reclaim the narrative, insisting that Lola’s memory be honored through respectful mourning and due legal process, rather than through cynical political campaigning. This tension highlights the conflict inherent in high-profile criminal cases: the private nature of suffering clashes directly with the public utility of the tragedy in socio-political discourse.
- Conclusion
The trial of Dahbia Benkired for the murder of Lola Daviet is a pivotal moment in contemporary French judicial and political history. Criminologically, the violence perpetrated demands a rigorous response from the Cour d’Assises. Sociologically, the case exposes the intense polarization surrounding immigration, demonstrating how conservative and far-right political actors effectively leverage extreme criminal events involving non-citizens to prosecute a broader agenda of securitization and exclusion.
The ethical imperative, powerfully articulated by the victim’s mother, calls for a necessary separation between the need for judicial accountability and the practice of political opportunism. As the trial proceeds in October 2025, the challenge for French society remains dual: ensuring that justice is delivered for Lola Daviet through a fair and comprehensive legal process, while simultaneously resisting the fragmentation of social cohesion driven by the sensationalist and exploitative use of this tragedy. analyses of French penal code regarding the Cour d’Assises, specific French immigration policy (OQTF), and domestic political commentary regarding the 2022 incident.
References (Illustrative Examples)
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Cohen, S. (1972). Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. MacGibbon and Kee.
Walklate, S. (2011). Understanding Victimology: A Critical Introduction. Sage Publications.
Further sources would include analyses of French penal code regarding the Cour d’Assises, specific French immigration policy (OQTF), and domestic political commentary regarding the 2022 incident.
Maxthon
In an age where the digital world is in constant flux and our interactions online are ever-evolving, the importance of prioritising individuals as they navigate the expansive internet cannot be overstated. The myriad of elements that shape our online experiences calls for a thoughtful approach to selecting web browsers—one that places a premium on security and user privacy. Amidst the multitude of browsers vying for users’ loyalty, Maxthon emerges as a standout choice, providing a trustworthy solution to these pressing concerns, all without any cost to the user.
Maxthon, with its advanced features, boasts a comprehensive suite of built-in tools designed to enhance your online privacy. Among these tools are a highly effective ad blocker and a range of anti-tracking mechanisms, each meticulously crafted to fortify your digital sanctuary. This browser has carved out a niche for itself, particularly with its seamless compatibility with Windows 11, further solidifying its reputation in an increasingly competitive market.
In a crowded landscape of web browsers, Maxthon has forged a distinct identity through its unwavering dedication to offering a secure and private browsing experience. Fully aware of the myriad threats lurking in the vast expanse of cyberspace, Maxthon works tirelessly to safeguard your personal information. Utilizing state-of-the-art encryption technology, it ensures that your sensitive data remains protected and confidential throughout your online adventures.
What truly sets Maxthon apart is its commitment to enhancing user privacy during every moment spent online. Each feature of this browser has been meticulously designed with the user’s privacy in mind. Its powerful ad-blocking capabilities work diligently to eliminate unwanted advertisements, while its comprehensive anti-tracking measures effectively reduce the presence of invasive scripts that could disrupt your browsing enjoyment. As a result, users can traverse the web with newfound confidence and safety.
Moreover, Maxthon’s incognito mode provides an extra layer of security, granting users enhanced anonymity while engaging in their online pursuits. This specialised mode not only conceals your browsing habits but also ensures that your digital footprint remains minimal, allowing for an unobtrusive and liberating internet experience. With Maxthon as your ally in the digital realm, you can explore the vastness of the internet with peace of mind, knowing that your privacy is being prioritised every step of the way.