Case Study

Background and Context

The Thailand-Cambodia border conflict represents a significant deterioration in relations between two ASEAN member states. The dispute reignited in December 2025 after the collapse of a ceasefire agreement that had been brokered by U.S. President Donald Trump and Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim in July 2025.

Timeline of Events

  • July 2025: Initial conflict leads to detention of 18 Cambodian soldiers by Thailand
  • July 2025: First ceasefire brokered by U.S. and Malaysian leadership
  • Early December 2025: Ceasefire breaks down, fighting resumes
  • December 7-27, 2025: 20 days of intensive combat involving air strikes, rocket fire, and artillery
  • December 27, 2025: New ceasefire agreement takes effect at noon
  • December 31, 2025: Thailand releases 18 detained Cambodian soldiers

Scale and Severity

The December conflict phase resulted in:

  • At least 101 fatalities across both sides
  • Over 500,000 displaced persons from border areas
  • Military escalation including fighter jet sorties, rocket exchanges, and sustained artillery barrages
  • Economic disruption to border trade and regional commerce

Key Issues

The delayed release of prisoners (originally scheduled for December 30, postponed to December 31) over alleged ceasefire violations demonstrates fragile trust between the parties and highlights implementation challenges even after formal agreements are signed.

Outlook

Short-Term Prospects (1-6 months)

Cautiously Optimistic but Fragile: The current ceasefire holds greater promise than the July agreement due to:

  • Higher human and economic costs creating stronger incentives for peace
  • International attention and pressure for sustained resolution
  • Successful completion of prisoner exchange building confidence

However, significant risks remain:

  • The previous ceasefire collapsed after just months
  • Underlying territorial disputes remain unresolved
  • Mutual accusations of violations could trigger renewed hostilities
  • Nationalist domestic pressures in both countries

Medium-Term Outlook (6-24 months)

Depends on Diplomatic Progress: Sustainability requires:

  • Formal border demarcation agreements addressing root causes
  • Confidence-building measures including joint patrols or buffer zones
  • Economic incentives for cooperation rather than conflict
  • Third-party mediation maintaining engagement beyond immediate crisis

Without addressing fundamental territorial disagreements, the pattern of ceasefire-conflict cycles is likely to continue.

Long-Term Strategic Implications

The conflict reveals deeper challenges:

  • ASEAN’s limitations in resolving member-state disputes
  • Potential for great power involvement (U.S., China) in regional conflicts
  • Nationalism trumping regional integration in Southeast Asia
  • Climate of uncertainty affecting investment and development

Solutions and Recommendations

Immediate Conflict Management

  1. Robust Ceasefire Monitoring Mechanism
    • Deploy international or ASEAN observers to border areas
    • Establish real-time communication channels between military commanders
    • Create clear protocols for investigating alleged violations
  2. Humanitarian Corridor Establishment
    • Ensure safe return of displaced populations
    • Coordinate international aid delivery
    • Address urgent needs in affected border communities

Diplomatic Solutions

  1. International Mediation Framework
    • Expand beyond bilateral negotiations to include ASEAN, UN, or other neutral parties
    • Leverage economic incentives from international community for sustained peace
    • Consider International Court of Justice referral for territorial disputes
  2. Border Demarcation Process
    • Commission independent survey of disputed territories
    • Negotiate land swaps or shared sovereignty arrangements
    • Establish joint economic zones in contested areas to reduce tensions
  3. Track II Diplomacy
    • Facilitate people-to-people exchanges and cultural programs
    • Engage civil society organizations in peace-building
    • Counter nationalist narratives through educational initiatives

Regional Framework Solutions

  1. Strengthen ASEAN Mechanisms
    • Activate ASEAN High Council for dispute resolution
    • Implement Treaty of Amity and Cooperation provisions more effectively
    • Create ASEAN peacekeeping capacity for intra-regional conflicts
  2. Economic Integration Incentives
    • Develop joint infrastructure projects linking both economies
    • Create special economic zones along pacified border regions
    • Increase trade interdependence to raise costs of conflict

Impact on Singapore

Economic Implications

Trade and Investment Disruption

  • Singapore maintains significant trade relationships with both Thailand and Cambodia
  • Regional instability undermines investor confidence in ASEAN markets
  • Supply chain disruptions affecting Singapore-based companies with operations in conflict zones
  • Potential increase in insurance and logistics costs for regional operations

Financial Market Effects

  • Volatility in Southeast Asian equity markets affects Singapore’s financial sector
  • Risk reassessment for regional investments managed from Singapore
  • Potential flight to safety benefiting Singapore as a stable hub

Strategic and Security Concerns

ASEAN Credibility Crisis

  • Conflict between member states undermines ASEAN centrality and cohesion
  • Challenges Singapore’s diplomatic investments in regional architecture
  • Exposes limitations of ASEAN’s conflict resolution mechanisms
  • May embolden external powers to play larger roles in regional disputes

Security Environment Deterioration

  • Precedent for armed conflict between ASEAN members raises regional threat levels
  • Potential spillover effects or copycat territorial disputes
  • Increased military spending diverting resources from development
  • Risk of refugee flows affecting broader region

Singapore’s Diplomatic Position

  • Pressure to take sides or remain neutral, both carrying costs
  • Opportunity to demonstrate leadership in mediation efforts
  • Test of Singapore’s ability to maintain relationships with conflicting parties
  • Balancing act between principle-based stance and pragmatic interests

Migration and Humanitarian Impact

Displaced Populations

  • Over 500,000 displaced persons may seek opportunities elsewhere in region
  • Potential secondary migration to Singapore if conflict persists
  • Humanitarian obligations versus immigration management concerns

Regional Labor Markets

  • Disruption to Thai and Cambodian workers who contribute to Singapore’s economy
  • Recruitment and deployment challenges for Singapore employers
  • Potential wage pressures if labor supply from affected countries decreases

Policy Recommendations for Singapore

  1. Diplomatic Engagement
    • Offer Singapore’s good offices for mediation or technical support
    • Work through ASEAN channels to strengthen collective response
    • Maintain balanced relationships with both parties
  2. Economic Preparedness
    • Assess exposure of Singapore companies to conflict zones
    • Develop contingency plans for supply chain disruptions
    • Consider economic assistance to support regional stability
  3. Regional Leadership
    • Advocate for strengthening ASEAN dispute resolution mechanisms
    • Support third-party mediation efforts
    • Promote confidence-building measures between conflicting parties
  4. Domestic Readiness
    • Monitor potential security implications for Singapore
    • Prepare for possible humanitarian assistance role
    • Manage potential migration pressures if conflict persists

Broader ASEAN Implications

The conflict serves as a critical test for ASEAN’s relevance and effectiveness. For Singapore, which has invested heavily in regional institutions and depends on a stable neighborhood for prosperity, the stakes are particularly high. A failure to resolve this dispute peacefully could:

  • Accelerate great power competition in Southeast Asia
  • Undermine decades of regional integration efforts
  • Create precedents that embolden other territorial disputes
  • Damage ASEAN’s credibility with dialogue partners and investors

Conversely, successful resolution could strengthen regional mechanisms and demonstrate ASEAN’s value, benefiting Singapore’s long-term strategic interests in maintaining a rules-based regional order.

Conclusion

The Thailand-Cambodia border conflict represents both a humanitarian crisis and a strategic challenge for Southeast Asia. While the current ceasefire offers hope, sustainable peace requires addressing root causes through diplomatic engagement, international mediation, and strengthened regional mechanisms. For Singapore, the conflict underscores the interconnected nature of regional security and prosperity, demanding active diplomatic engagement while preparing for various contingencies. The resolution of this dispute will significantly influence ASEAN’s future trajectory and Singapore’s regional strategic environment.