Bank Runs: Deep Analysis and Impact on Singapore

Understanding Bank Runs: Psychological and Economic Dynamics

The Psychology of Panic

Bank runs represent one of the most vivid examples of collective panic in financial markets. They operate on a fundamental asymmetry: while banks operate on fractional reserve systems (keeping only a small percentage of deposits as cash), depositors can collectively demand immediate access to funds that physically don’t exist in the vaults.

The psychological triggers include:

Information cascades: When early withdrawers signal distress, others follow regardless of their own information
Herding behaviour: The safety-in-numbers mentality that drives mass action
Loss aversion: People fear losing everything more than they value potential gains from staying
Social proof: Seeing queues at banks becomes evidence of underlying problems

Modern vs. Traditional Bank Runs

Silent Bank Runs have fundamentally changed the landscape. Digital banking means:

Withdrawals happen at electronic speed, not physical queues
Social media amplifies panic faster than traditional news cycles
Mobile banking apps can be overwhelmed, creating technical failures that worsen panic
Cross-border capital flight becomes instantaneous

Economic Mechanics

Bank runs create several cascading effects:

Liquidity Crisis: Banks must sell assets quickly at below-market prices
Credit Contraction: Surviving banks become risk-averse, reducing lending
Contagion Effects: Panic spreads to healthy institutions
Real Economy Impact: Business loans dry up, employment falls, and consumer spending drops

Singapore’s Banking Landscape: Vulnerabilities and Strengths

Structural Characteristics

Singapore’s banking sector has unique features that affect bank run dynamics:

Vulnerabilities:

Concentration Risk: Dominated by three major local banks (DBS, OCBC, UOB) plus significant foreign presence
International Exposure: Heavy reliance on cross-border banking and trade finance
Wealth Management Hub: Large deposits from high-net-worth individuals who can move funds quickly
Tech-Savvy Population: High digital banking adoption means potential for rapid electronic withdrawals
Small Geography: News travels fast in a compact, highly connected society

Strengths:

Strong Regulatory Framework: The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) maintains strict supervision
High Capital Ratios: Singapore banks typically maintain capital well above international requirements
Deposit Insurance: Singapore Deposit Insurance Corporation (SDIC) protects deposits up to S$100,000
Government Backing: Implicit government support for major local banks
Diversified Economy: Less dependent on single sectors compared to some regional economies

Historical Context

Singapore has experienced banking stress during:

1997 Asian Financial Crisis: Regional contagion affected local banks, but no major runs occurred
2008 Global Financial Crisis: Some foreign banks faced pressure, but local banks remained stable
COVID-19 Pandemic: Increased provisions for loans, but no systemic stress

Potential Impact Scenarios

Mild Scenario (Single Institution):

Focused run on one bank due to specific concerns
Other banks benefit from flight-to-safety deposits
MAS intervenes quickly with liquidity support
Limited real economy impact

Moderate Scenario (Sector-Wide Concern):

Multiple banks face withdrawal pressure
Credit markets tighten, affecting business lending
Property market stress due to mortgage concerns
Regional financial centre status temporarily affected

Severe Scenario (Systemic Crisis):

Mass withdrawals across all major banks
Payment systems strain under electronic withdrawal volume
Currency pressure as funds flee to foreign banks
Real economy recession as credit freezes
Potential threat to Singapore’s financial hub status

Singapore’s Defensive Mechanisms

Regulatory Tools:

MAS Emergency Powers: Can restrict withdrawals, provide emergency liquidity
Bank Integration: Large local banks have diversified revenue streams
Stress Testing: Regular assessment of banks’ ability to handle severe scenarios
International Cooperation: Strong relationships with global central banks

Market Structure Advantages:

Foreign Bank Presence: Provides alternative banking options, reducing system concentration
Strong Corporate Governance: Local banks have professional management and oversight
Technology Infrastructure: Robust payment systems can handle high transaction volumes

Risk Mitigation Strategies

For Individual Depositors:

Spread deposits across multiple banks to stay within SDIC limits
Maintain accounts with both local and foreign banks
Keep some liquid assets in different currencies
Understand SDIC coverage and claim procedures

For Businesses:

Diversify banking relationships across multiple institutions
Maintain credit facilities with different banks
Consider foreign bank accounts for international operations
Implement treasury management systems for real-time cash monitoring

For Policymakers:

Enhance real-time monitoring of deposit flows
Improve communication strategies during crises
Coordinate with regional regulators on cross-border issues
Regularly update emergency response procedures

Global Lessons for Singapore

From Silicon Valley Bank (2023):

Concentration of depositors in a single sector (tech) creates vulnerability
Social media and digital banking accelerate crisis timing
Uninsured deposits above coverage limits create flight risk

From European Banking Crisis:

Cross-border banking creates complex resolution challenges
Currency considerations become critical during stress
Political factors can override economic fundamentals

From the Japanese Banking Crisis (1990s):

Prolonged banking sector weakness can drag down the economy for decades
Early intervention is crucial to prevent zombie banks
Real estate connections amplify banking sector stress

Future Considerations

Technological Evolution:

Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) could change deposit dynamics
Cryptocurrency adoption might provide an alternative store of value
AI and machine learning could improve early warning systems

Regulatory Evolution:

Enhanced international coordination on banking supervision
Real-time monitoring systems for deposit flows
Dynamic insurance coverage that adjusts to economic conditions

Geopolitical Factors:

US-China tensions could affect cross-border banking.
Regional integration might create new systemic risks
Climate change could create new categories of banking stress

Singapore’s position as a financial hub means that while it has strong defences against bank runs, it also faces unique vulnerabilities due to its international connectivity and concentration of financial services. The key lies in maintaining robust regulatory oversight while preserving the openness that makes Singapore attractive as a financial centre.

Bank Runs: Comprehensive Analysis and Singapore’s Vulnerability Matrix

Theoretical Foundations of Bank Runs

The Diamond-Dybvig Model: Core Mechanics

Bank runs represent a fundamental coordination problem in financial systems. Douglas Diamond and Philip Dybvig’s theoretical foundation reveals why bank runs are both rational individual responses and collectively destructive outcomes.

Fractional Reserve Banking Vulnerability: Banks operate on the principle that not all depositors will demand their money simultaneously. They keep only 8-12% of deposits as reserves, lending the remainder. This creates an inherent maturity mismatch: liquid deposit liabilities backed by illiquid loan assets.

Multiple Equilibrium Problem:

Good Equilibrium: Depositors believe the bank is stable, few withdraw, and the bank remains stable
Bad Equilibrium: Depositors expect others to withdraw, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy of failure

Information Asymmetries: Depositors cannot perfectly observe bank health. They must infer the bank condition from:

Public information (financial statements, regulatory reports)
Market signals (stock prices, credit default swaps)
Social information (actions of other depositors)

Behavioural Economics of Panic

Cognitive Biases in Bank Runs:

Availability Heuristic: Recent examples (Silicon Valley Bank, Credit Suisse) make bank failures seem more probable
Confirmation Bias: Depositors seek information confirming their fears while dismissing reassurances
Social Proof: Seeing others withdraw money becomes evidence of underlying problems
Loss Aversion: The pain of potential losses outweighs the cost of unnecessary precautions

Network Effects in Modern Banking:

Digital Amplification: Social media spreads rumours faster than traditional verification mechanisms
Cascade Effects: Early withdrawers create information cascades affecting later decision-makers
Threshold Effects: Once withdrawal rates exceed certain levels, panic becomes self-sustaining

II. Evolution of Bank Run Dynamics

Traditional vs. Modern Bank Runs

Historical Bank Runs (Pre-1980s):

Physical presence is required at bank branches
Limited by banking hours and physical capacity
News travelled through traditional media
Geographic limitations contained the spread
Government responses had time to develop

Digital Age Bank Runs (1990s-2010s):

Electronic transfers increased speed
24/7 banking enabled continuous withdrawals
Internet accelerated information spread
Cross-border transfers became easier
Regulatory responses needed to be faster

Modern Silent Bank Runs (2010s-Present):

Mobile banking enables instant withdrawals
Social media creates a viral panic spread
Algorithmic trading amplifies market signals
Global interconnectedness increases contagion
High-frequency news cycles demand immediate responses

Technology’s Role in Acceleration

Mobile Banking Impact: Singapore has 95% smartphone penetration and 85% mobile banking adoption. This creates unique vulnerabilities:

Withdrawal requests can co-occur across the entire customer base
No physical bottlenecks limit withdrawal speed
Technical failures (app crashes) can worsen panic by appearing as bank problems

Social Media Amplification:

WhatsApp groups enable family/community-wide financial discussions
Telegram channels spread unverified financial rumours
Reddit and HardwareZone create echo chambers of concern
LinkedIn financial professional networks add apparent credibility to speculation

III. Singapore’s Banking Ecosystem: Structural Analysis

Market Structure and Concentration Risk

Domestic Banking Concentration: Singapore’s banking sector exhibits high concentration, creating systemic vulnerabilities:

DBS Group: 30% market share, S$680 billion assets
OCBC Bank: 22% market share, S$480 billion assets
UOB Group: 20% market share, S$420 billion assets
Combined: 72% of domestic banking assets

Foreign Bank Presence: 28% market share across multiple institutions provides some diversification, but creates different risks:

Wholesale Flight Risk: Foreign countries prioritise home country operations during global stress
Regulatory Complexity: Multiple jurisdictions complicate crisis response
Capital Repatriation: Parent banks may withdraw capital during home country stress

Deposit Structure Vulnerabilities

High-Value Depositor Concentration: Singapore’s role as a wealth management hub creates unique risks:

Private banking clients often exceed SDIC insurance limits
High-net-worth individuals can move funds quickly across borders
Corporate deposits from regional headquarters are typically uninsured above S$100,000

Sectoral Concentration:

Real Estate: 25% of bank lending, vulnerable to property cycle downturns
Trade Finance: 20% of business lending, exposed to global trade disruptions
Oil & Gas: 8% of corporate lending, sensitive to commodity price volatility

Interconnectedness Risks

Regional Financial Hub Status: Singapore’s centrality creates both strength and vulnerability:

Strength: Diversified revenue from across ASEAN
Vulnerability: Contagion from regional crises affects Singapore disproportionately

Cross-Border Banking Relationships:

Singapore banks have significant operations in Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand
Regional economic stress can simultaneously affect multiple revenue streams
Currency hedging relationships create complex derivative exposures

IV. Vulnerability Assessment Matrix

Critical Risk Factors for Singapore

Probability Multipliers:

Digital Infrastructure (High Risk)
- 95% mobile banking adoption
- Social media penetration >90%
- A tech-savvy population is comfortable with instant transfers
- Risk Rating: 8/10
Wealth Management Concentration (High Risk)
- S$4.2 trillion assets under management
- Many accounts exceed insurance coverage
- International client base can withdraw cross-border
- Risk Rating: 8/10
Economic Openness (Medium-High Risk)
- Trade-to-GDP ratio >300%
- Exposure to global economic cycles
- Foreign exchange volatility affects bank funding costs
- Risk Rating: 7/10
Small Geographic Scale (Medium Risk)
- Information travels quickly in a compact society
- Limited ability to contain regional panic
- But also enables rapid government response
- Risk Rating: 6/10

Protective Factors:

Regulatory Strength (High Protection)
- MAS maintains strict supervision
- Regular stress testing and capital requirements
- Strong crisis management capabilities
- Protection Rating: 9/10
Government Financial Strength (High Protection)
- AAA sovereign credit rating
- Large fiscal reserves (>100% of GDP)
- Government Investment Corporation provides a backstop
- Protection Rating: 9/10
Banking System Fundamentals (High Protection)
- Strong capital ratios (14-16% vs. 8% minimum)
- Conservative lending practices
- Diversified revenue streams
- Protection Rating: 8/10

Scenario Impact Analysis

Scenario 1: Single Bank Crisis (Probability: 15%)

Trigger: Major loan losses at one domestic bank due to sectoral exposure

Impact Severity: Moderate

The affected bank faces liquidity pressure
Other banks benefit from flight-to-safety deposits
Limited real economy impact
Government/MAS intervention contains the crisis within 48-72 hours

Economic Cost: S$5-10 billion in market cap losses, minimal GDP impact

Scenario 2: Domestic Banking Sector Stress (Probability: 8%)

Trigger: Regional economic crisis affecting all Singapore banks simultaneously

Impact Severity: High

Multiple banks face withdrawal pressure
Credit markets tighten significantly
Property market stress from mortgage concerns
Regional financial centre status temporarily affected
International confidence in the Singapore financial system has been damaged

Economic Cost: S$20-40 billion in losses, 1-2% GDP contraction

Scenario 3: Systemic Financial Crisis (Probability: 3%)

Trigger: Global financial crisis with Singapore-specific amplifying factors

Impact Severity: Severe

Mass withdrawals across the entire banking system
Payment system infrastructure strained
Currency under severe pressure
Credit freeze affecting the entire economy
Long-term damage to financial hub status
Potential need nationalizationalisation

Economic Cost: S$100+ billion in losses, 4-6% GDP contraction

V. Propagation Mechanisms and Contagion Channels

Domestic Contagion Pathways

Information Contagion:

A bank run at Institution A creates doubt about Institution B
Shared customer bases (corporate banking relationships)
Common sectoral exposures create correlated risks
Media coverage amplifies concerns across all banks

Funding Market Contagion:

Interbank lending markets freeze during stress
Money market fund redemptions affect bank funding
Foreign exchange swap markets become stressed
Repo markets experience dysfunction

Real Economy Feedback Loops:

Credit contraction reduces business investment
Property market stress affects bank collateral values
Employment impacts reduce consumer spending
Tax revenue impacts limit government fiscal response

International Contagion Channels

Regional Banking Networks: Singapore banks’ ASEAN operations create bidirectional contagion risks:

Stress in Singapore affects regional subsidiaries
Regional economic problems flow back to Singapore parents
Currency hedging relationships create complex exposures

Global Financial Market Linkages:

Singapore Dollar carry trades unwind during stress
Foreign investor withdrawals from Singapore assets
Credit default swap markets price in elevated risks
International money market funds reduce Singapore bank exposure

VI. Singapore’s Crisis Management Framework

Institutional Response Mechanisms

Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) Powers:

Emergency liquidity assistance to solvent banks
Temporary restrictions on large withdrawals
Coordination with international central banks
Stress testing and early intervention authority

Government of Singapore Fiscal Capacity:

S$400+ billion in reserves available for crisis response
Government Investment Corporation can provide capital injections
Temporary deposit insurance increases possible
Coordinated economic stimulus capabilities

Singapore Deposit Insurance Corporation (SDIC):

Current coverage: S$100,000 per depositor per bank
Resolution authority for failed institutions
Industry-funded insurance fund of S$3+ billion
Coordination with MAS for systemically important banks

Communication Strategy Frameworks

Multi-Channel Crisis Communication:

Immediate social media response to counter misinformation
Traditional media engagement with financial journalists
Direct customer communication through banking apps/websites
Community leader engagement in multiple languages

Credibility Management:

Technical explanations backed by data
International expert endorsements
Historical precedent references
Clear, consistent messaging across all channels

VII. Comparative Analysis: Global Bank Run Cases

Silicon Valley Bank (2023): Lessons for Singapore

Similarities to Singapore Risk Profile:

High concentration of uninsured deposits (94% vs Singapore’s ~60%)
A tech-savvy customer base is comfortable with digital banking
Social media amplification of panic
Venture capital network accelerated information spread

Key Differences:

SVB lacked diversified revenue streams (concentrated in the tech sector)
Poor asset-liability management (duration risk from bond portfolio)
No equivalent to Singapore’s intense regulatory supervision
Limited government backstop compared to Singapore’s fiscal capacity

Lessons for Singapore:

The concentration of similar customer types increases coordinated withdrawal risk
Digital banking eliminates the traditional “friction” that slowed historical bank runs
Regulatory early warning systems must monitor deposit concentration by sector/network
Crisis communication must be prepared for social media speed

Credit Suisse (2023): Systemic Risk Implications

Risk Factors Present in Singapore:

International banking operations create complex exposures
Wealth management business with mobile, high-value clients
Derivative trading creates counterparty risks
GGovernment’simplicit support expectations

Risk Factors Absent in Singapore:

Repeated regulatory violations and management failures
Excessive risk-taking in investment banking
Weak capital position relative to risk profile
Limited fiscal capacity of the home government

Lessons for Singapore:

International operations require powerful risk management
Wealth management clients can withdraw funds rapidly across borders
Counterparty risk management is crucial for systemically important banks
Strong regulatory relationships are essential for crisis management

VIII. Future Risk Evolution

Emerging Vulnerabilities

Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) Impact: If Singapore implements a retail CBDC, it could create new bank run dynamics:

Instant conversion from bank deposits to CBDC eliminates withdrawal friction
Direct central bank accounts compete with commercial bank deposits
Enhanced government monitoring capability vs. privacy concerns

Cryptocurrency Integration: Growing cryptocurrency adoption creates new flight-to-safety alternatives:

Stablecoins provide USD-denominated alternatives to SGD deposits
Decentralised finance (DeFi) protocols offer banking alternatives
Cross-border cryptocurrency transfers are harder to monitor/restrict

Climate Risk Integration: Climate change creates new categories of systemic financial risk:

Physical risks affecting Singapore (sea level rise, extreme weather)
Transition risks from stranded fossil fuel assets
Reputation risks for banks financing high-carbon activities

Technological Evolution of Bank Runs

Artificial Intelligence Impact:

AI-powered trading algorithms could accelerate market-based bank runs
Predictive analytics might identify at-risk institutions earlier
Automated portfolio management could trigger coordinated withdrawals
Social media monitoring AI could help authorities respond faster

Internet of Things (IoT) and Real-Time Data:

Real-time economic data could trigger faster market responses
IoT sensors providing immediate physical economy information
Reduced lag time between economic shocks and financial market reactions

IX. Policy Recommendations

Strengthening Resilience

Regulatory Enhancements:

Dynamic Deposit Insurance: Coverage that automatically increases during stress periods
Real-Time Monitoring: Enhanced surveillance of deposit flows and social media sentiment
Cross-Border Coordination: Stronger relationships with regional regulators for crisis management
Stress Testing Evolution: Scenarios Incorporating Social Media-Accelerated Bank Runs

Institutional Improvements:

Crisis Communication Preparedness: Pre-drafted responses for various bank run scenarios
Technology Infrastructure: Banking systems capable of handling extreme transaction volumes
International Relationships: Enhanced swap lines and cooperation agreements with global central banks
Legal Framework Updates: Modern bank resolution procedures for digital age crises

Building System Antifragility

Diversification Strategies:

Encourage deposit spreading across multiple institutions.
Develop alternative funding sources for banks (covered bonds, etc.)
Strengthen non-bank financial intermediation as a system backup
Build redundancy in the payment systems infrastructure

Innovation Integration:

Careful CBDC design to complement rather than replace commercial banking
Regulatory sandbox for financial innovation with systemic risk assessment
Integration of climate risk into banking supervision
Development of green finance as an economic diversification strategy

X. Conclusion: Singapore’s Bank Run Resilience Profile

Singapore faces a complex bank run risk profile. The city-state’s advanced digital infrastructure, sophisticated population, and role as a regional financial hub create conditions where bank runs could develop with unprecedented speed and severity. However, Singapore also possesses powerful defensive mechanisms: robust regulatory oversight, substantial government fiscal capacwell-capitalizedpitalized banking institutions.

The key insight is that Singapore’s bank run risk is not primarily about traditional bank solvency issues but about confidence management in a hyper-connected, digitally enabled society. The speed at which information travels and decisions are executed means that Singapore must maintain crisis management capabilities that operate at the pace of social media rather than traditional banking cycles.

Singapore’s banking system is fundamentally sound, but the dynamics of modern bank runs mean that soundness alone is insufficient. Diverse stakeholders operating at digital speed with global alternatives readily available must also continuously and convincingly perceive the system as sound.

The ultimate test of Singapore’s financial system resilience will not be whether it can prevent bank runs entirely – that may be impossible in the digital age – but whether it can contain and resolve them quickly enough to preserve confidence in Singapore as a stable, reliable financial centre for the region and the world.

The Marina Bay Run

A Financial Thriller Set in Singapore

Chapter 1: The WhatsApp Message

Dr. Sarah Chen was reviewing patient charts when her phone buzzed with a message in her extended family WhatsApp group. Her cousin Marcus, who worked at a hedge fund, had forwarded a Bloomberg terminal screenshot.

Marcus: “Guys, something weird is happening with Prosperity Bank. Their overnight funding costs just spiked 300 basis points. My trader friends are talking.”

Sarah barely registered it. As a cardiologist at Singapore General Hospital, banking drama wasn’t her concern. But then her phone buzzed again.

Aunt Helen: “Aiya, I have S$800,000 with Prosperity! Should I be worried?”

Marcus: “The SDIC only covers S$100k per account. You might want to consider spreading it around.”

Within minutes, the group chat exploded. Her uncle’s construction business had S$2 million with Prosperity. Her cousin Janet’s wedding savings were there. Even her grandmother kept her angbao money in a Prosperity fixed deposit.

Sarah’s phone rang. It was her husband, David, a software engineer at a local fintech startup.

“Sarah, have you seen the news about Prosperity Bank?”

“What news? I just saw some family chat about funding costs.”

“It’s all over Telegram and Reddit. Apparently, they have massive exposure to some Chinese property developer that’s about to default. The rumour is they might lose S$3 billion.”

Sarah felt her stomach tighten. Their joint account with S$150,000 – their flat downpayment – was with Prosperity.

“David, that’s just rumours, right?”

“Maybe. But I’m looking at their app right now, and it’s running incredibly slowly. I think a lot of people are trying to access their accounts.”

Chapter 2: Digital Avalanche

By 6 PM, Prosperity Bank’s mobile app had crashed completely. Their website showed only an error message: “We are experiencing technical difficulties. Please try again later.”

In the Facebook group “Singapore Banking and Finance,” speculation ran wild:

“Prosperity Bank app down for 3 hours now. Something’s not right.”

“My friend works there. Says they’re having ‘liquidity discussions’ with MAS.”

“Just tried calling their hotline. Wait time is over 2 hours.”

Richard Tan, a 45-year-old electronics shop owner in Chinatown, read these messages with growing alarm. His entire life savings – S$400,000 from selling his father’s shophouse – sat in a Prosperity high-yield account. His hands shook as he tried the app again. Still down.

He called his son Jeremy, who was studying finance at NTU.

“Dad, don’t panic, but you should probably try to withdraw as much as you can tomorrow morning. If there’s really a problem, you want to be early in line.”

“But the SDIC will protect me, right?”

“Only up to S$100,000, Dad. You’re way over that limit.”

That night, Richard couldn’t sleep. He wasn’t alone. Across Singapore, thousands of Prosperity Bank customers were lying awake, phones glowing in the darkness as they refreshed news websites and banking apps.

Chapter 3: The Morning Rush

At 5:30 AM, Richard was already dressed and ready. He had checked Google Maps – the nearest Prosperity branch was on Orchard Road, opening at 9 AM. He planned to be first in line.

But when he arrived at 7 AM, there were already twelve people ahead of him.

“Uncle, you are also here to take out money?” asked a woman in her thirties, clutching a folder of documents.

“My whole family’s money is inside,” Richard replied. “Twenty years of savings.”

By 8 AM, the line stretched around the block. Office workers in their morning suits stood next to retirees with their thermoses, all united by the same fear. A TV news crew arrived, and people started covering their faces.

Mrs. Lim, a 68-year-old retiree, was near the front of the line. She had arrived at 4 AM.

“My grandfather lost everything when the Japanese occupied Singapore,” she told anyone who would listen. “He always said, ‘When in doubt, take the money out.’ I should have listened earlier.”

At precisely 9 AM, the bank’s glass doors opened. The branch manager, a tired-looking man in his fifties, stood with security guards.

“Ladies and gentlemen, Prosperity Bank is operating normally. Your deposits are safe. We have adequate cash on hand to meet all withdrawal requests.”

But his voice wavered, and nobody in line looked convinced.

Chapter 4: Contagion

By noon, images of queues outside Prosperity Bank branches were trending on Singapore social media. The hashtag #ProsperityBankRun spread faster than the 1997 haze.

What started as a concern about one bank began affecting others. At United Commercial Bank, across the street from the main Prosperity branch, customers started asking questions.

“Is our bank safe?” a customer asked the teller.

“Of course, sir. We have no connection to Prosperity Bank’s issues.”

But by 2 PM, United Commercial Bank also had a line forming outside.

Sarah Chen found herself in that line. After successfully withdrawing their money from Prosperit (ough she waited four hours)s he and David decided to be safe and diversify their savings. But now she was worried about United Commercial Bank, too.

“This is ridiculous,” she muttered to David. “Yesterday everything was fine, today we’re running between banks like it’s 1930.”

Her phone buzzed with a text from her hospital colleague: “Sarah, patients are asking if they should withdraw money from banks. What should I tell them?”

The panic was spreading beyond banking customers to ordinary Singaporeans who had never experienced a financial crisis.

Chapter 5: Government Response

An emergency press conference was called at 3 PM at the Monetary Authority of Singapore headquarters. Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Lawrence Wong stood beside MAS Managing Director Ravi Menon.

“Singaporeans can have full confidence in our banking system,” DPM Wong declared. Prosperity Bank is well-capitalised, diversified, and able to meet all customer obligations. The queues we’re seeing today are based on rumours, not facts.”

Ravi Menon added technical details: “Prosperity Bank’s capital adequacy ratio remains above regulatory requirements. We have been in close contact with the bank’s management throughout the day. There is no insolvency issue.”

But the cameras also caught something else: behind the officials, through the MAS building’s windows, another line of people could be seen outside a DBS branch.

The contagion was spreading to Singapore’s largest bank.

Chapter 6: Digital Age Panic

What made this bank run different from historical ones was the speed of digital transactions. While people queued physically at branches, others were frantically trying to transfer money online.

Jeremy Tan, Richard’s finance student son, was part of a different kind of run. Instead of withdrawing cash, young Singaporeans moved money to foreign banks and cryptocurrency exchanges and even bought gold through online platforms.

“Dad, forget the queues,” Jeremy told his father over the phone. “I’m helping all my friends move their money to HSBC and Citibank. Foreign banks can’t fail the same way.”

But the foreign banks weren’t immune either. By evening, their systems were slowing down due to the volume of new account applications and fund transfers.

On HardwareZone forum, Singapore’s largest tech community, threads exploded:

“Which banks are safe? DBS? OCBC? UOB?”

“Should we be buying USD? Gold? Bitcoin?”

“Does anyone know if Malaysian banks accept Singaporeans quickly?”

The government’s afternoon reassurances seemed to have little effect. Social media moved faster than official statements.

Chapter 7: The Breaking Point

By the second day, what had started as a run on Prosperity Bank had become a crisis of confidence in Singapore’s entire banking system. The three local giants – DBS, OCBC, and UOB – all reported unusually high withdrawal volumes.

At the Singapore Exchange, bank stocks were in freefall. DBS had dropped 15%, OCBC 12%, and UOB 18%. International investors were pulling money out of Singapore, causing the SGD to weaken against the USD.

Richard Tan stood in his empty electronics shop, watching the news. He had successfully withdrawn his S$400,000 from Prosperity, but now it sat in cash in a safe deposit box. He didn’t know where to put it.

“Son,” he called Jeremy. “What if all the banks fail? What if this whole country fails?”

Jeremy, despite his finance education, had no good answer. This scenario wasn’t in any textbook.

Chapter 8: International Ripples

The Singapore banking crisis began affecting the region. In Hong Kong, wealthy families started questioning their Singapore private banking arrangements. In Malaysia, customers began withdrawing from Singapore bank branches in Kuala Lumpur and Johor Bahru.

The Bank of Thailand issued a statement saying it was “monitoring the situation in Singapore closely.” The Philippine central bank did the same. What was happening in Singapore—ASEAN’s financial capital—could affect the entire region.

Currency traders in London and New York began shorting the Singapore Dollar, betting that the banking crisis would force the MAS to cut interest rates or intervene in currency markets.

At Prosperity Bank’s headquarters in Raffles Place, CEO Michael Lim worked through his second consecutive sleepless night. Despite government assurances, his bank had lost S$8 billion in deposits in two days. They were technically solvent but practically running out of cash.

“We need the MAS to provide emergency liquidity,” he told his board over a 3 AM video call. “If we can’t open tomorrow, we’re finished.”

Chapter 9: The Intervention

At 6 AM on the third day, before markets opened, the Monetary Authority of Singapore announced unprecedented measures:

Emergency liquidity facilities for all Singapore banks
Temporary increase in deposit insurance coverage to S$500,000
Coordinated support from the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC)
Real-time monitoring of all large deposit movements

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong appeared on national television:

Singapore’s banking system is fundamentally sound. We will use all necessary resources to ensure stability. No depositor will lose money in a Singapore bank while I am Prime Minister.”

The statement was broadcast in English, Mandarin, Malay, and Tamil. It was shared across every social media platform, sent as emergency alerts to mobile phones, and displayed on digital billboards across the island.

Chapter 10: Gradual Recovery

The government intervention worked, but slowly. By the fourth day, the queues began to shorten. By the end of the week, Prosperity Bank’s app was working normally again, though with additional security measures.

Richard Tan finally redeposited his money, which was spread across three different banks —BS, OCBC, and HSBC —keeping each account under the insurance limit.

Sarah Chen and her husband also kept their money diversified. Still, they had learned something about themselves and their society: the thin line between confidence and panic, between stability and chaos.

“The scary thing,” Sarah told David over dinner, “is how quickly everything almost fell apart. We’re supposed to be rational, educated people, but we all acted on fear.”

Jeremy Tan wrote his final finance project about the bank run, “Digital Panic: How Social Media Accelerated Singapore’s First Modern Bank Run.” His professor gave him an A+ but noted, “Let’s hope this remains theoretical.”

Epilogue: Lessons Learned

Six months later, Singapore’s banking system had not only recovered but also strengthened. New regulations required banks to maintain higher liquidity buffers. The SDIC deposit insurance was permanently increased to S$250,000. Digital banking systems were stress-tested for high-volume scenarios.

But the psychological scars remained. Singaporeans had learned that even the most stable-seeming systems could be fragile. Bank managers had learned that in the digital age, a bank run could happen in hours, not days.

Richard Tan spread his money across multiple banks and bought a small amount of gold, just in case. Sarah Chen made sure she understood exactly how deposit insurance worked. Jeremy Tan got job offers from three banks that wanted to hire someone who understood how quickly financial panic could spread.

And in the MAS crisis management room, now equipped with real-time social media monitoring systems, officials monitored for early signs of the next crisis.

Because in Singapore’s hyper-connected, digitally-enabled society, they knew there would be a next time.

Author’s Note: This story is entirely fictional. Any resemblance to actual banks, events, or persons is coincidental. Prosperity Bank and United Commercial Bank are fictional institutions created for this narrative.

Maxthon

In an age where the digital world is in constant flux and our interactions online are ever-evolving, the importance of prioritising individuals as they navigate the expansive internet cannot be overstated. The myriad of elements that shape our online experiences calls for a thoughtful approach to selecting web browsers—one that places a premium on security and user privacy. Amidst the multitude of browsers vying for users’ loyalty, Maxthon emerges as a standout choice, providing a trustworthy solution to these pressing concerns, all without any cost to the user.

Maxthon, with its advanced features, boasts a comprehensive suite of built-in tools designed to enhance your online privacy. Among these tools are a highly effective ad blocker and a range of anti-tracking mechanisms, each meticulously crafted to fortify your digital sanctuary. This browser has carved out a niche for itself, particularly with its seamless compatibility with Windows 11, further solidifying its reputation in an increasingly competitive market.

In a crowded landscape of web browsers, Maxthon has forged a distinct identity through its unwavering dedication to offering a secure and private browsing experience. Fully aware of the myriad threats lurking in the vast expanse of cyberspace, Maxthon works tirelessly to safeguard your personal information. Utilising state-of-the-art encryption technology, it ensures that your sensitive data remains protected and confidential throughout your online adventures.

What truly sets Maxthon apart is its commitment to enhancing user privacy during every moment spent online. Each feature of this browser has been meticulously designed with the user’s privacy in mind. Its powerful ad-blocking capabilities work diligently to eliminate unwanted advertisements, while its comprehensive anti-tracking measures effectively reduce the presence of invasive scripts that could disrupt your browsing enjoyment. As a result, users can traverse the web with newfound confidence and safety.

Moreover, Maxthon’s incognito mode provides an extra layer of security, granting users enhanced anonymity while engaging in their online pursuits. This specialised mode not only conceals your browsing habits but also ensures that your digital footprint remains minimal, allowing for an unobtrusive and liberating internet experience. With Maxthon as your ally in the digital realm, you can explore the vastness of the internet with peace of mind, knowing that your privacy is being prioritised every step of the way.

Understanding Bank Runs and Financial Stability