The Proposed Change
The Fed wants to adjust its supervisory rating framework for big banks (those with $100+ billion in assets domestically, or $50+ billion for foreign banks). Currently, banks are rated on three components – capital, liquidity, and governance/controls – with four possible ratings each. Under the current system, any single “deficient-1” rating means a bank is not considered “well managed.”
The proposal would allow banks with no more than one “deficient-1” rating to still be deemed “well managed,” potentially reducing the number of “not well managed” institutions from 23 to 15.
The Debate
The proposal has created a clear divide among Fed officials:
Supporters (including Vice Chair Michelle Bowman) argue that:
- About two-thirds of big banks currently aren’t considered “well managed” despite having strong capital and liquidity levels
- The current system is too rigid, basing the designation on a single deficiency rather than overall condition
- The change would better align ratings with the banks’ actual financial strength
Critics (notably Fed Governor Michael Barr) warn that:
- This “fundamentally changes” the established concept of being well managed
- Banks with serious deficiencies in cybersecurity, anti-money laundering, or consumer compliance could still be rated “well managed”
- It could allow weaker institutions to undertake activities like acquisitions that should be reserved for healthy firms
Implications
This represents a potentially significant shift toward more lenient bank supervision under Bowman’s leadership, focusing more on financial metrics rather than operational controls. The proposal is now open for public comment for 30 days after Federal Register publication.
The debate reflects broader philosophical differences about bank supervision – whether to emphasize quantitative financial measures or maintain strict standards across all operational areas.
Federal Reserve’s “Well-Managed” Bank Rating Proposal: Impact on US Banks
Current State of US Bank Ratings
The Federal Reserve’s Large Financial Institution (LFI) rating framework currently classifies about two-thirds of major US banks as “not well managed” despite having capital and liquidity levels substantially above regulatory requirements. This seemingly paradoxical situation stems from the current system’s strict approach where any single “deficient-1” rating across the three components (capital, liquidity, governance/controls) disqualifies a bank from “well-managed” status.
The proposal would reduce the number of “not well managed” bank holding companies from 23 to 15 – a 35% reduction that would immediately benefit 8 major US banking institutions.
Which Banks Are Affected
The framework applies to:
- Domestic banks with $100 billion or more in assets
- Foreign banks with $50 billion or more in US assets
This encompasses major US institutions including:
- Tier 1 banks: JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Citigroup
- Regional giants: US Bancorp, PNC Financial, Capital One, Bank of New York Mellon
- Specialized institutions: Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, American Express
Immediate Operational Benefits for US Banks
Enhanced Strategic Flexibility
Banks that gain “well-managed” status would immediately unlock several critical capabilities:
Merger & Acquisition Activity: Currently, “only well managed firms are allowed to engage in acquisitions because such expansions in firms that are not well managed could threaten their safety and soundness” Banks With One ‘Deficient’ Rating Could Still Be Considered ‘Well Managed’ Under New Federal Reserve Proposal. This change could trigger increased M&A activity as previously restricted banks pursue growth strategies.
Capital Management: Well-managed banks typically have more flexibility in:
- Dividend distribution policies
- Share buyback programs
- Capital structure optimization
- Subsidiary investments
Product Innovation: Greater latitude to launch new financial products and services without intensive regulatory pre-approval processes.
Geographic Expansion: Easier approval for new branch openings and market expansion initiatives.
Risk Assessment and Concerns
Operational Risk Blind Spots
The most significant concern centers on governance and controls deficiencies. Under the proposed framework, banks could maintain “well-managed” status despite serious operational shortcomings in critical areas:
Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities: Banks with deficient cyber controls could still qualify as well-managed, creating systemic risk in an increasingly digital banking environment.
Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Failures: Institutions with weak AML/CFT systems could maintain favorable ratings, potentially facilitating financial crimes.
Consumer Protection Gaps: Banks with poor consumer compliance programs could avoid regulatory constraints while continuing problematic practices.
Systemic Risk Implications
Governor Michael Barr warns that “the current proposal would fundamentally change the long-established concept of well managed and would introduce greater risk to the banking system” Federal Reserve Board – Federal Reserve Board requests comment on targeted proposal to revise its supervisory rating framework for large bank holding companies to address the “well managed” status of these firms – THAIFRX.com. This concern reflects several systemic risks:
Procyclical Effects: Easier access to “well-managed” status during economic expansions could amplify risk-taking behavior when banks should be building buffers.
Moral Hazard: Reduced consequences for operational deficiencies may incentivize banks to underinvest in risk management infrastructure.
Contagion Risk: Banks with operational weaknesses engaging in expansion activities could spread risks across the financial system.
Competitive Dynamics
Market Concentration Effects
The proposal could accelerate consolidation in the US banking sector by:
- Enabling previously restricted banks to pursue acquisitions
- Creating competitive pressure on smaller institutions
- Potentially reducing the number of independent regional banks
International Competitiveness
US banks could gain advantages in global markets through:
- Faster international expansion capabilities
- Enhanced product offerings to multinational clients
- Improved capital efficiency compared to more restrictively supervised foreign competitors
Regulatory Philosophy Shift
From Holistic to Quantitative Focus
The proposal represents a fundamental shift from comprehensive risk assessment to quantitative metrics prioritization. Vice Chair Michelle Bowman’s approach emphasizes:
- Financial strength metrics over operational excellence
- Composite assessment rather than single-point-of-failure evaluation
- Pragmatic supervision focused on material financial risks
Alignment with Industry Pressure
The banking industry has long argued that current supervision is overly restrictive, particularly regarding:
- Operational risk management requirements
- Compliance program standards
- Governance framework expectations
Economic and Market Implications
Credit Market Effects
Enhanced bank flexibility could lead to:
- Increased lending capacity as banks pursue growth strategies
- Lower borrowing costs for consumers and businesses
- Enhanced financial innovation in lending products
Stock Market Impact
Bank stocks could benefit from:
- Improved earnings prospects from expanded activities
- Enhanced dividend policies from better-rated institutions
- M&A premiums for potential acquisition targets
Housing Market Considerations
With easier access to “well-managed” status, banks might:
- Expand mortgage lending operations
- Develop new housing finance products
- Increase competition in residential lending markets
Implementation Timeline and Process
The proposal enters a 30-day comment period following Federal Register publication. Key stakeholders providing input will include:
- Banking industry associations
- Consumer advocacy groups
- Academic researchers
- International regulatory bodies
Implementation could occur within 6-12 months following comment period closure, subject to final Federal Reserve Board approval.
Strategic Recommendations for US Banks
Immediate Actions
- Assess Current Ratings: Evaluate potential for “well-managed” status under new framework
- Prepare Strategic Plans: Develop acquisition and expansion strategies contingent on rating improvements
- Strengthen Governance: Address any “deficient-2” ratings that would still disqualify institutions
Long-term Positioning
- Maintain Operational Excellence: Use enhanced flexibility to build competitive advantages
- Prepare for Increased Competition: Expect more aggressive competitors in previously restricted markets
- Build Systemic Resilience: Invest in risk management to avoid future regulatory backlash
Conclusion
The Federal Reserve’s proposal represents the most significant relaxation of bank supervision standards in recent years. While it offers substantial operational benefits to US banks, it also introduces considerable systemic risks that could undermine financial stability. The ultimate impact will depend on how banks use their enhanced flexibility and whether they maintain strong risk management practices despite reduced regulatory pressure.
The proposal reflects broader tensions between promoting banking sector competitiveness and maintaining prudential oversight – a balance that will require careful monitoring as implementation proceeds.
The Federal Reserve’s proposed relaxation of “well-managed” bank criteria offers substantial strategic advantages to US banks. Currently, about two-thirds of major US banks are classified as “not well managed” despite having strong capital and liquidity positions. The proposal would immediately benefit 8 major banking institutions, reducing the “not well managed” category from 23 to 15 banks.
1. Enhanced Merger & Acquisition Capabilities
Immediate M&A Opportunities
The most significant benefit is expanded M&A activity. Recent data shows that 34% of the top 50 US banks were open to or actively pursuing acquisitions by fall 2024, up from just 12% in 2023 Fed considering changes to what constitutes a ‘well-managed’ bank. The new “well-managed” criteria would unlock M&A opportunities for previously restricted banks.
Strategic Advantages:
- Market Consolidation: Banks can pursue strategic acquisitions to gain market share
- Geographic Expansion: Access to new markets through acquisition rather than organic growth
- Technology Integration: Acquire fintech capabilities and digital banking platforms
- Talent Acquisition: Access specialized expertise through strategic purchases
Industry M&A Momentum
More than two in five bank leaders believe their institutions will buy another bank in 2025, with 43% saying their institutions are very or somewhat likely to make acquisitions Speech by Governor Bowman on a fresh look at supervision and regulation – Federal Reserve Board. This suggests significant pent-up demand that the new criteria could unleash.
2. Enhanced Capital Management Flexibility
Dividend and Share Buyback Programs
Well-managed banks typically enjoy greater flexibility in capital distribution policies:
Dividend Optimization:
- Higher dividend payout ratios
- More predictable dividend growth policies
- Enhanced ability to maintain dividends during economic stress
Share Buyback Programs:
- Larger authorized buyback amounts
- More flexible timing of repurchases
- Better capital efficiency through opportunistic buybacks
Capital Structure Benefits
Banks with “well-managed” status can:
- Optimize capital ratios more effectively
- Issue subordinated debt with fewer restrictions
- Manage regulatory capital more efficiently
- Access capital markets on better terms
3. Operational and Strategic Flexibility
‘
Product Innovation and Launch
Well-managed banks face fewer regulatory hurdles when:
- Launching new financial products and services
- Expanding into adjacent markets (fintech, wealth management)
- Implementing new technologies (AI, blockchain applications)
- Offering innovative lending products
Geographic and Market Expansion
Enhanced regulatory standing enables:
- Faster branch expansion approvals
- Entry into new metropolitan areas
- International expansion capabilities
- Digital banking platform launches
4. Competitive Market Positioning
Market Share Growth
The proposal creates opportunities for:
- Accelerated organic growth through expanded product offerings
- Market share capture from competitors still under restrictions
- Premium pricing for services due to enhanced capabilities
- Customer acquisition through improved service offerings
Industry Leadership
Banks achieving “well-managed” status can:
- Lead industry consolidation efforts
- Set market standards for new products and services
- Attract top talent seeking growth opportunities
- Command premium valuations from investors
5. Financial Performance Benefits
Revenue Growth Opportunities
While higher deposit costs will keep net interest income in check, noninterest income could offer a bright spot for topline growth Banks With One ‘Deficient’ Rating Could Still Be Considered ‘Well Managed’ Under New Federal Reserve Proposal. Well-managed banks can capitalize on this through:
Fee Income Expansion:
- Investment banking services
- Wealth management offerings
- Transaction processing capabilities
- Corporate advisory services
Trading and Markets:
- Enhanced trading capabilities
- Market-making opportunities
- Derivatives and structured products
- Foreign exchange services
Cost Management and Efficiency
Well-managed status enables:
- Economies of scale through acquisitions
- Technology investments with faster ROI
- Operational efficiency improvements
- Shared services optimization
6. Risk Management and Regulatory Benefits
Reduced Regulatory Burden
Banks with “well-managed” status typically experience:
- Fewer regulatory examinations
- Streamlined approval processes
- Reduced compliance costs
- Less intensive supervision
Enhanced Risk Profile
The designation signals:
- Strong governance to stakeholders
- Robust risk management capabilities
- Regulatory confidence in management
- Stable operational performance
7. Market Valuation and Investor Benefits
Stock Market Performance
Well-managed banks typically enjoy:
- Higher price-to-book ratios
- Premium valuations compared to peers
- Increased institutional ownership
- Better analyst coverage and ratings
Investor Confidence
The designation provides:
- Enhanced transparency in regulatory standing
- Predictable capital policies
- Stable dividend prospects
- Growth visibility through expanded capabilities
8. Strategic Timing Advantages
Current Market Conditions
The proposal comes at an opportune time when:
- M&A activity among U.S. banks could pick up in the second half as fears of a recession dissipate and regulatory agencies become more open to consolidation Banks With One ‘Deficient’ Rating Could Still Be Considered ‘Well Managed’ Under New Federal Reserve Proposal
- Interest rate environment may stabilize
- Economic conditions support expansion
- Technology investments are paying off
Competitive Positioning
Early adopters of “well-managed” status can:
- Capture first-mover advantages in acquisitions
- Establish market leadership positions
- Build strategic partnerships before competitors
- Secure premium assets at reasonable prices
Implementation Strategy for Banks
Immediate Actions
- Assess Current Ratings: Evaluate potential qualification under new criteria
- Strategic Planning: Develop acquisition and expansion strategies
- Capital Allocation: Prepare for enhanced capital management flexibility
- Market Positioning: Communicate enhanced capabilities to stakeholders
Long-term Benefits Realization
- Sustainable Growth: Use enhanced flexibility to build long-term competitive advantages
- Risk Management: Maintain strong controls despite reduced regulatory pressure
- Stakeholder Value: Deliver consistent returns through improved operational capabilities
- Market Leadership: Establish dominant positions in target markets
Conclusion
The Federal Reserve’s proposed “well-managed” criteria relaxation offers transformative benefits to US banks, particularly in M&A capabilities, capital management flexibility, and operational freedom. With 43% of bank leaders saying their organization is very or somewhat likely to buy another bank by the end of 2025 DBS vs. UOB vs. OCBC – Which Singapore Bank Emerged the Winner in its 4Q and FY2024 Results? – The Singaporean Investor, the timing aligns perfectly with industry consolidation trends.
The key to maximizing these benefits lies in strategic preparation and disciplined execution. Banks that can demonstrate strong governance while leveraging enhanced flexibility will be best positioned to capture market opportunities and deliver superior shareholder returns in the evolving regulatory environment.
Maxthon
In an age where the digital world is in constant flux and our interactions online are ever-evolving, the importance of prioritising individuals as they navigate the expansive internet cannot be overstated. The myriad of elements that shape our online experiences calls for a thoughtful approach to selecting web browsers—one that places a premium on security and user privacy. Amidst the multitude of browsers vying for users’ loyalty, Maxthon emerges as a standout choice, providing a trustworthy solution to these pressing concerns, all without any cost to the user.
Maxthon, with its advanced features, boasts a comprehensive suite of built-in tools designed to enhance your online privacy. Among these tools are a highly effective ad blocker and a range of anti-tracking mechanisms, each meticulously crafted to fortify your digital sanctuary. This browser has carved out a niche for itself, particularly with its seamless compatibility with Windows 11, further solidifying its reputation in an increasingly competitive market.
In a crowded landscape of web browsers, Maxthon has forged a distinct identity through its unwavering dedication to offering a secure and private browsing experience. Fully aware of the myriad threats lurking in the vast expanse of cyberspace, Maxthon works tirelessly to safeguard your personal information. Utilizing state-of-the-art encryption technology, it ensures that your sensitive data remains protected and confidential throughout your online adventures.
What truly sets Maxthon apart is its commitment to enhancing user privacy during every moment spent online. Each feature of this browser has been meticulously designed with the user’s privacy in mind. Its powerful ad-blocking capabilities work diligently to eliminate unwanted advertisements, while its comprehensive anti-tracking measures effectively reduce the presence of invasive scripts that could disrupt your browsing enjoyment. As a result, users can traverse the web with newfound confidence and safety.
Moreover, Maxthon’s incognito mode provides an extra layer of security, granting users enhanced anonymity while engaging in their online pursuits. This specialised mode not only conceals your browsing habits but also ensures that your digital footprint remains minimal, allowing for an unobtrusive and liberating internet experience. With Maxthon as your ally in the digital realm, you can explore the vastness of the internet with peace of mind, knowing that your privacy is being prioritised every step of the way.