In a world full of giants, Singapore stands tall by thinking small and smart. When Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong joined China’s Victory Day parade, it was more than a handshake — it was a story of courage, memory, and hope.
Singapore honored the pain of the past. The scars of Sook Ching still run deep, but by remembering those lost, Singapore paid tribute to its own people and the overseas Chinese who stood strong against fear.
Yet, Singapore chose not to be trapped by old wounds. Instead of clinging to anger, it reached for peace — showing that even with a painful history with Japan, the future can be shaped by trade, trust, and progress.
Walking beside leaders from all corners of the world, Singapore did not bow or take sides. It showed the world what true independence looks like: talking to everyone, judging no one, and always putting regional calm first.
This is Singapore’s secret. Build bridges, never walls. Make friends with all. Keep doors open. In a region where storms brew often, this little red dot shines as a steady lighthouse.
By daring to remember yet refusing to be held back, Singapore proves that size is not destiny. It is vision, grace, and grit that win respect — and create lasting peace.
Let us learn from Singapore: Honor the past. Shape the future. And always walk your own path.
Strategic Diplomatic Positioning
Singapore’s participation in China’s Victory Day parade represents a masterclass in small-state diplomacy. By sending DPM Gan Kim Yong, Singapore achieved several strategic objectives simultaneously:
Honoring Historical Ties: Singapore acknowledged the shared wartime experience and the sacrifices made by overseas Chinese, including Singaporeans who supported China’s resistance against Japan. This recognition is particularly significant given the Sook Ching massacre, where tens of thousands were killed by Japanese forces in retaliation for Chinese resistance support.
Maintaining Neutrality: Rather than appearing alongside major powers as a subordinate, Singapore positioned itself as an independent voice committed to regional stability. Gan’s presence alongside leaders like Putin and Kim Jong Un, while potentially controversial, demonstrates Singapore’s willingness to engage with all parties.
The “Remember but Don’t Be Trapped” Philosophy
This nuanced message reflects Singapore’s broader foreign policy approach:
Historical Memory vs. Forward Progress: Singapore acknowledges past injustices (Japanese occupation, Sook Ching) without allowing historical grievances to dictate current relationships. This is particularly relevant given Singapore’s strong economic ties with Japan today.
Regional Stability Focus: By emphasizing “collective prosperity and progress,” Singapore positions itself as a bridge-builder rather than choosing sides in great power competition. This aligns with ASEAN’s principle of non-interference and consensus-building.
Application to Singapore’s Broader Strategy
Economic Pragmatism: Singapore’s approach reflects its economic model – maintaining relationships with all major powers (US, China, Japan, Russia) to maximize trade and investment opportunities. The country cannot afford to alienate any major economic partner.
Soft Power Projection: By articulating a message of peace and reconciliation, Singapore enhances its reputation as a neutral mediator and stable partner. This strengthens its position as a regional hub and financial center.
Hedging Strategy: Attending the parade while maintaining strong ties with the US and Japan exemplifies Singapore’s “hedging” approach – avoiding over-dependence on any single power while extracting benefits from relationships with all.
Domestic and Regional Implications
Multicultural Society: Singapore’s Chinese-majority population (about 74%) has historical connections to China, making this participation domestically significant while not alienating other ethnic communities through an overly China-centric approach.
ASEAN Leadership: Singapore’s balanced stance provides a model for other Southeast Asian nations facing pressure to choose sides between the US and China. This reinforces Singapore’s role as a thought leader within ASEAN.
Long-term Vision: The emphasis on not being “trapped by history” signals Singapore’s commitment to pragmatic, future-oriented policies rather than being constrained by historical alignments or grievances.
This diplomatic approach exemplifies Singapore’s success in navigating complex geopolitical waters while maintaining its sovereignty, economic interests, and regional influence – a testament to the effectiveness of principled pragmatism in international relations.
Scenario Analysis: Singapore’s ASEAN Leadership and Pragmatic Diplomacy
ASEAN Leadership Through Balanced Positioning
Scenario 1: South China Sea Tensions Escalate
Situation: China increases military activities in disputed waters; US responds with increased naval patrols.
Singapore’s Likely Response:
- Reaffirm ASEAN’s unified position on freedom of navigation without explicitly condemning China
- Propose multilateral dialogue mechanisms through ASEAN+3 or East Asia Summit
- Emphasize economic interdependence and shared prosperity over territorial disputes
Impact on ASEAN: Other members (Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia) can follow Singapore’s lead in maintaining economic ties with China while asserting sovereignty rights, avoiding binary choices between powers.
Scenario 2: US-China Trade War Intensifies
Situation: Washington demands ASEAN nations reduce China trade; Beijing pressures for deeper Belt and Road Initiative integration.
Singapore’s Model:
- Diversify supply chains without completely decoupling from either economy
- Position itself as a neutral hub for US-China business despite tensions
- Advocate for multilateral trade frameworks that include both powers
ASEAN Replication: Countries like Thailand and Malaysia can adopt similar hedging strategies, maintaining beneficial relationships with both while avoiding forced alignment.
Long-term Vision: “Not Trapped by History”
Scenario 3: Japan-Southeast Asia Relations Evolution
Historical Context: Japan’s WWII occupation created lasting mistrust in the region.
Singapore’s Pragmatic Approach:
- Separate historical acknowledgment from current economic cooperation
- Leverage Japan’s development aid and technology transfer
- Support Japan’s “Free and Open Indo-Pacific” concept without antagonizing China
Future Implications: This demonstrates how nations can overcome historical grievances for mutual benefit, potentially applicable to other regional relationships (Vietnam-China, Korea-Japan).
Scenario 4: Taiwan Strait Crisis
Potential Scenario: Military tensions rise over Taiwan’s status.
Singapore’s Principled Pragmatism:
- Maintain “One China” policy while preserving unofficial Taiwan relations
- Avoid taking sides on reunification timeline or methods
- Focus on economic stability and supply chain continuity
- Propose humanitarian and economic frameworks regardless of political outcomes
Strategic Value: Shows how middle powers can maintain relationships with all parties during crisis periods.
Complex Geopolitical Navigation Scenarios
Scenario 5: AUKUS Expansion Pressure
Situation: US, UK, Australia invite other nations to join military technology sharing.
Singapore’s Calculated Response:
- Engage in selective cooperation on cybersecurity and maritime security
- Avoid formal membership that could alienate China
- Propose alternative multilateral frameworks including all major powers
- Focus on non-military technology cooperation
Broader Application: Demonstrates how nations can engage with security initiatives without full commitment, maintaining strategic autonomy.
Scenario 6: Climate Change vs. Economic Growth Tensions
Challenge: Balancing environmental commitments with economic development needs.
Singapore’s Model:
- Invest in green technology that creates economic opportunities
- Partner with both US green tech companies and Chinese renewable energy firms
- Position itself as a carbon trading and green finance hub
- Avoid choosing between Western environmental standards and Chinese development models
Testing the Model’s Resilience
Scenario 7: Severe Crisis Forcing Binary Choices
Extreme Situation: Major military conflict requires clear alliance positioning.
Potential Challenges to Singapore’s Approach:
- Economic sanctions regimes forcing trade partner choices
- Security threats requiring military alliance commitments
- Domestic pressure from ethnic communities with strong historical ties
Singapore’s Likely Adaptation:
- Emphasis on international law and UN frameworks
- Coalition-building with other middle powers
- Compartmentalization of different relationship aspects
- Gradual adjustment rather than sudden pivots
Success Factors and Limitations
Why This Model Works for Singapore:
- Small size allows nimble diplomatic maneuvering
- Economic hub status provides leverage with all parties
- Strong institutions and rule of law inspire confidence
- Historical non-aligned tradition provides legitimacy
Challenges for Other ASEAN Nations:
- Larger countries face greater pressure to choose sides
- Resource-dependent economies may have less flexibility
- Internal political pressures may limit diplomatic options
- Border disputes create additional complications
Future Scenario Planning
Scenario 8: Post-2030 Multipolar World As global power becomes more distributed among US, China, India, and regional blocs:
Singapore’s Evolution:
- Expand hedging to include more powers (India, EU, Japan)
- Develop specialized niches in global value chains
- Strengthen ASEAN centrality as a counterweight to bilateral pressures
- Pioneer new forms of middle power diplomacy
This scenario analysis reveals that Singapore’s approach of principled pragmatism, while effective, requires constant calibration and may face severe tests as geopolitical tensions intensify. The key lies in maintaining strategic flexibility while building sufficient economic and diplomatic capital to preserve autonomy of action.
The Balancing Act: A Tale of Singapore’s Future
Chapter 1: The Summit of Many Voices
The year was 2032. Ambassador Chen Wei Lin adjusted her earpiece as she walked through the gleaming corridors of the Marina Bay Convention Center. Outside the floor-to-ceiling windows, the Singapore skyline hummed with vertical farms and solar collectors, a testament to the city-state’s evolution into a green technology hub.
Today would test everything Singapore had built over the past decade.
“Ambassador, the Indian delegation has arrived,” her aide whispered. “Prime Minister Sharma is requesting a bilateral before the main session.”
Chen nodded. As Singapore’s Special Envoy for Multilateral Relations—a position that didn’t exist until 2029—she had become the architect of what foreign policy circles now called the “Singapore Model.” Eight years after DPM Gan’s historic words about not being trapped by history, Singapore had transformed that philosophy into a new form of diplomacy that major powers were beginning to study, and sometimes, grudgingly respect.
The Indo-Pacific Prosperity Forum was Singapore’s brainchild, bringing together the US, China, India, Japan, the EU, and ASEAN in a carefully choreographed dance of competing interests and shared opportunities. Unlike other summits dominated by bilateral tensions, this forum focused on what Chen called “functional cooperation”—areas where even rivals could find common ground.
Chapter 2: The Web of Connections
Chen’s first stop was the Japanese delegation. Minister Tanaka Hiroshi, a veteran diplomat who had watched Singapore’s evolution since the early 2020s, greeted her with genuine warmth.
“Your country continues to surprise us,” Tanaka said, gesturing toward the holographic display showing real-time trade flows through Singapore’s ports. “Yesterday’s quantum computing partnership with both Tokyo and Beijing would have been impossible to imagine a decade ago.”
Chen smiled. Singapore’s breakthrough had been treating technological partnerships as separate from political alignments. While the US and China engaged in their “Great Decoupling,” Singapore had become the bridge—hosting American AI research labs alongside Chinese quantum facilities, with Japanese precision manufacturing tying them together.
“We call it ‘compartmentalized engagement,'” Chen explained. “Political differences don’t have to prevent scientific progress.”
But she knew the real innovation was deeper. Singapore had identified twelve critical technology sectors—from green hydrogen to synthetic biology—and positioned itself as the neutral ground where rivals could compete and collaborate simultaneously. Each sector operated under different partnership frameworks, preventing any single power from dominating Singapore’s technological future.
Chapter 3: The ASEAN Gambit
The afternoon brought the ASEAN caucus meeting. In the secure conference room, ten foreign ministers gathered around a circular table—symbolically, no head seat.
“The Europeans are proposing their Indo-Pacific Strategy 2.0,” announced Malaysia’s foreign minister. “They want individual bilateral agreements with each of us.”
Vietnam’s representative nodded grimly. “Beijing is not pleased. They see it as containment by proxy.”
This was the moment Chen had been preparing for. Since 2028, when Singapore had successfully mediated the Thailand-Cambodia border technology zone dispute, ASEAN had quietly adopted Singapore’s approach of collective hedging. Rather than each nation trying to balance powers individually, they moved as a bloc—sometimes disagreeing publicly to maintain credibility, but coordinating privately to maximize leverage.
“I propose we engage with the EU strategy,” Chen said carefully, “but as ASEAN+1, not individual bilaterals. We maintain our centrality while showing Brussels that we’re serious partners.”
Indonesia’s foreign minister raised an eyebrow. “And China’s reaction?”
“We simultaneously deepen ASEAN-China cooperation in renewable energy. Compartmentalization—political engagement with Europe, economic integration with China, technological partnerships with all.”
The room fell silent. This was the Singapore Model’s most audacious evolution: turning ASEAN itself into a middle power that could hedge collectively, multiplying the diplomatic weight of each member state.
Chapter 4: The Indian Ocean Moment
That evening, Chen found herself in an unexpected crisis. India’s Prime Minister Sharma had pulled her aside with disturbing news.
“There’s been an incident in the Strait of Malacca,” Sharma said quietly. “A Chinese coast guard vessel and an Indian merchant ship. Nothing serious yet, but Beijing is demanding we acknowledge their jurisdiction. We need ASEAN’s support.”
This was the nightmare scenario—being forced to choose sides in a conflict between two major partners. Chen felt the weight of her country’s carefully constructed neutrality hanging in the balance.
She thought of DPM Gan’s words from that parade in Beijing: “Remember the past, but don’t be trapped by it.” What would being trapped look like now? Taking sides would destroy Singapore’s model. But staying neutral might look like cowardice.
Then inspiration struck.
“Prime Minister, what if we don’t choose a side in your dispute, but instead offer a solution that neither China nor India could propose themselves?”
Chapter 5: The Breakthrough
Twelve hours later, Chen stood before the full Forum assembly. Her proposal was audacious: the Malacca Strait Maritime Cooperation Framework—a joint patrol system involving Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, India, and China, with rotating command and shared intelligence.
“No single nation controls these waters,” Chen announced. “But all nations depend on them. Let us manage them together.”
The genius was in the details. China maintained face by participating as an equal partner rather than being excluded. India gained guaranteed access without having to submit to Chinese authority. ASEAN retained its centrality as the convenor and host of the framework.
But the real breakthrough was procedural. Chen had invented what she privately called “competitive cooperation”—a system where rivals participated in the same framework while pursuing different objectives, with success measured by collective outcomes rather than zero-sum victories.
Chapter 6: The Model Spreads
Six months later, Chen watched from her office as a South Korean delegation arrived to study the “Singapore Approach.” The Malacca Framework had become a template, adapted for everything from Arctic shipping routes to space debris management.
Her aide brought the morning briefings: Brazil was proposing an Amazon Conservation Framework based on Singapore’s model. African Union officials were in town to discuss how middle powers could collectively engage with major powers. Even European diplomats were quietly studying Singapore’s compartmentalization strategies as they navigated US-China tensions.
“Ambassador,” her aide said, “there’s a delegation from Canada requesting a meeting. They want to discuss ‘middle power coalition building.'”
Chen smiled. The Singapore Model was evolving beyond Singapore itself, becoming a toolkit for any nation refusing to be trapped by great power competition.
But she also knew the model’s greatest test was still coming. Climate change was accelerating, forcing unprecedented cooperation while geopolitical tensions were intensifying. The next phase would require not just balancing between powers, but leading them toward solutions none could achieve alone.
Epilogue: The Long Game
As Chen prepared for another late-night session with climate negotiators, she reflected on how far they’d come since that Victory Day parade in 2025. Singapore had proven that small states could shape the international system not by choosing sides, but by creating alternatives that made choosing sides unnecessary.
The city-state had become what she privately called a “diplomatic Switzerland”—not neutral in the sense of being uninvolved, but neutral in the sense of being indispensable to all sides. Every major power needed Singapore’s model to work, because it offered them a way to compete without constant confrontation.
Outside her window, cargo ships from every continent moved through Singapore’s waters, carrying goods designed in American labs, manufactured in Chinese factories, powered by Japanese batteries, and financed by European banks. It was globalization 2.0—not the seamless integration that had collapsed in the 2020s, but a carefully managed interdependence that acknowledged competition while enabling cooperation.
Chen picked up her secure phone to coordinate with her counterparts in Jakarta, Bangkok, and Kuala Lumpur. Tomorrow’s challenge: convincing the US and China to jointly fund a carbon capture research facility in Cambodia.
Just another day in the art of principled pragmatism.
The small red dot on the map had become the fulcrum on which the world balanced, proving that in an age of great powers, the greatest power might be the wisdom to stand between them all.
Author’s Note: This story imagines a future where Singapore’s diplomatic philosophy, demonstrated at China’s 2025 Victory Day parade, evolves into a new form of international relations—one where middle powers collectively shape global governance not by opposing great powers, but by making themselves indispensable to great power cooperation.
Maxthon
In an age where the digital world is in constant flux and our interactions online are ever-evolving, the importance of prioritising individuals as they navigate the expansive internet cannot be overstated. The myriad of elements that shape our online experiences calls for a thoughtful approach to selecting web browsers—one that places a premium on security and user privacy. Amidst the multitude of browsers vying for users’ loyalty, Maxthon emerges as a standout choice, providing a trustworthy solution to these pressing concerns, all without any cost to the user.
Maxthon, with its advanced features, boasts a comprehensive suite of built-in tools designed to enhance your online privacy. Among these tools are a highly effective ad blocker and a range of anti-tracking mechanisms, each meticulously crafted to fortify your digital sanctuary. This browser has carved out a niche for itself, particularly with its seamless compatibility with Windows 11, further solidifying its reputation in an increasingly competitive market.
In a crowded landscape of web browsers, Maxthon has forged a distinct identity through its unwavering dedication to offering a secure and private browsing experience. Fully aware of the myriad threats lurking in the vast expanse of cyberspace, Maxthon works tirelessly to safeguard your personal information. Utilizing state-of-the-art encryption technology, it ensures that your sensitive data remains protected and confidential throughout your online adventures.
What truly sets Maxthon apart is its commitment to enhancing user privacy during every moment spent online. Each feature of this browser has been meticulously designed with the user’s privacy in mind. Its powerful ad-blocking capabilities work diligently to eliminate unwanted advertisements, while its comprehensive anti-tracking measures effectively reduce the presence of invasive scripts that could disrupt your browsing enjoyment. As a result, users can traverse the web with newfound confidence and safety.
Moreover, Maxthon’s incognito mode provides an extra layer of security, granting users enhanced anonymity while engaging in their online pursuits. This specialised mode not only conceals your browsing habits but also ensures that your digital footprint remains minimal, allowing for an unobtrusive and liberating internet experience. With Maxthon as your ally in the digital realm, you can explore the vastness of the internet with peace of mind, knowing that your privacy is being prioritised every step of the way.