Steel Flowers and Concrete Gardens: A Comparative Analysis of Urban Identity and Architectural Expression in Taiwan and Singapore
Abstract

This paper explores the distinctive architectural expressions that have shaped urban identity in Taiwan and Singapore, focusing on Taiwan’s decorative metal window grilles (tiě chuāng huā) and Singapore’s planned HDB architectural typologies. It argues that while these manifestations arose from fundamentally different approaches – individual, spontaneous folk art in Taiwan versus state-led design and communal planning in Singapore – both nations have successfully forged meaningful architectural cultures reflecting their socio-economic histories, cultural values, and aspirations. By analyzing the genesis, functions, and cultural significance of these elements, this paper provides a comparative lens into how urban landscapes become enduring narratives of transformation, community, and belonging in East and Southeast Asia.

1. Introduction

The built environment often serves as a tangible archive of a nation’s history, economy, and social fabric. Within the rapidly evolving urban landscapes of East and Southeast Asia, Taiwan and Singapore present fascinating case studies of how distinct developmental paths have imprinted themselves on architectural forms. This paper delves into two particularly evocative architectural phenomena: Taiwan’s unique decorative metal window grilles, known as tiě chuāng huā (iron window flowers), and Singapore’s comprehensive, government-planned public housing (HDB) architectural elements, including the void deck, mosaic playgrounds, and distinctive block designs.

The central hypothesis of this study is that despite originating from divergent philosophies – Taiwan’s grilles emerging from individual artistic freedom and economic prosperity, and Singapore’s HDB estates from top-down urban planning and social engineering – both embody a profound cultural richness. They function not merely as physical structures but as powerful signifiers of national identity, economic progress, and evolving social values, offering a rich comparative lens into urban cultural development. This paper will first examine the Taiwanese context, then explore the key architectural features of Singapore’s public housing, culminating in a comparative analysis that highlights their shared significance in defining their respective urban experiences.

2. The Blossoming of “Tiě Chuāng Huā” in Taiwan

Taiwan’s decorative metal window grilles, or tiě chuāng huā, represent a unique and spontaneous folk art movement that emerged during a period of profound national transformation. Their proliferation is inextricably linked to Taiwan’s post-World War II industrial development and the subsequent “Taiwan Miracle” economic boom.

2.1 Historical Context and Economic Prosperity

The ascent of tiě chuāng huā began as Taiwan’s steel industry developed after World War II. However, their true flourish occurred during the economic boom of the 1960s-1980s, a period when Taiwan’s per capita GNP soared from $170 in 1952 to over $53,000 by 2018 (PPP-adjusted). This unprecedented economic growth fueled a rising middle class with disposable income and a desire to personalize their homes. The relatively lax regulations of the time allowed a groundswell of individual expression to manifest on the facades of residential buildings, leading to the widespread adoption of decorative grilles.

2.2 Artistic Freedom and Cultural Expression

Unlike state-mandated aesthetic guidelines, Taiwan’s tiě chuāng huā were the product of individual metalworkers and homeowners. This fostered an environment of remarkable artistic freedom, where functional security grilles were transformed into elaborate decorative art. Each building often featured unique, hand-welded designs incorporating a diverse lexicon of motifs. These included natural elements such as mountains, clouds, and flowers, alongside intricate geometric patterns. This phenomenon effectively constituted a spontaneous folk art movement, where skilled artisans, driven by economic prosperity and personal creativity, contributed to a vibrant and diverse urban aesthetic. The grilles acted as a canvas for individual expression, allowing residents to imbue otherwise standardized apartment blocks with a distinctive personal touch.

2.3 Multiple Functions and Social Significance

Beyond their aesthetic appeal, tiě chuāng huā served a multitude of practical functions that resonated with the needs of urban dwellers in a rapidly modernizing society. Primarily, they provided a crucial layer of security against theft, a common concern in burgeoning cities. Additionally, the grilles offered practical extensions of living space, enabling residents to hang laundry, display potted plants, or even create small, semi-private balconies. They also facilitated ventilation, a necessity in Taiwan’s subtropical climate, while maintaining safety for residents, particularly children. In a broader sense, these grilles functioned as a subtle yet pervasive form of personal expression, allowing inhabitants to project their identity and aspirations onto the external face of their homes, fostering a sense of ownership and individuality within dense urban environments.

3. Singapore’s Designed Urban Tapestry: HDB Architectural Typologies

In stark contrast to Taiwan’s organic expression, Singapore’s urban identity has been meticulously shaped by top-down urban planning, most notably through the Housing & Development Board (HDB) public housing estates. These estates are characterized by a set of iconic architectural features designed to foster community, efficiency, and a distinct national aesthetic.

3.1 The Void Deck: Communal Hearth of the HDB

The void deck stands as Singapore’s most iconic architectural innovation in public housing. Introduced in the early 1970s, although first implemented in 1963 at Block 26 Jalan Klinik, it features smooth grey concrete floors, white walls, and rectangular pillars, creating an open, sheltered space at the ground level of residential blocks. Far from being mere empty space, void decks are meticulously designed communal areas. They serve as versatile venues for a wide array of activities, from casual community gatherings and children’s play to significant life events such as Malay weddings, Chinese funerals, and birthday parties. Beyond these traditional uses, void decks have evolved; Block 56 Pipit Road hosts Singapore’s first void deck art gallery featuring Van Gogh reproductions, and some now house community fridges, stocking fresh groceries for needy residents. The void deck thus embodies Singapore’s vision of fostering social cohesion and interaction within its high-rise communities.

3.2 Terrazzo and Mosaic Heritage: Playgrounds and Public Art

The artistic integration into Singapore’s HDB landscape extended beyond the void deck to public spaces, particularly playgrounds. HDB designer Khor Ean Ghee, in 1979, brought imaginative playground ideas to life using durable materials like concrete, terrazzo, and mosaic tiles. This era saw the introduction of iconic designs, most notably the beloved dragon playground. Other designs drew inspiration from nursery rhymes, various animals, and elements of local heritage, such as bumboats and trishaws. These playgrounds were more than just recreational facilities; they were vibrant expressions of public art that instilled a sense of wonder and playfulness into the urban fabric, creating memorable landmarks and fostering a unique childhood experience for generations of Singaporeans.

3.3 Unique Block Designs and Urban Planning Philosophies

Singapore’s HDB architecture also boasts a variety of distinctive block designs, reflecting a continuous evolution in urban planning theory and aesthetic considerations. Many HDB blocks in Pasir Ris, for instance, feature maritime-inspired elements like lighthouse-shaped turrets and porthole-shaped openings, reflecting the coastal environment. Block 259 Ang Mo Kio Avenue 2 stands out as the only clover-shaped, circular block of flats in Singapore, built in 1981, showcasing experimental structural forms.

Furthermore, the design of common corridors has been crucial. By widening corridors, their utilitarian function is transformed into community spaces in the sky, connecting neighbors and fostering interaction within what architect Liu Thai Ker termed “vertical kampungs” – a modern interpretation of traditional village living. Point block HDBs, characterized by their tall, narrow design with circular or triangular cores, were first built at Mei Ling Street in 1969, maximizing views and light while addressing land constraints.

Architect Liu Thai Ker’s vision further shaped the HDB aesthetic by introducing street architecture that meticulously considers how each block relates to its neighbors. His approach also incorporated pastel shades for building exteriors, reflecting the tropical environment and subtly referencing Malay cultural aesthetics, contributing to a harmonious and identity-rich urban environment.

4. Divergent Paths, Shared Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis

The architectural narratives of Taiwan and Singapore, as told through their window grilles and HDB typologies, represent fundamentally different approaches to urban development and identity formation, yet both have yielded profoundly meaningful urban experiences.

4.1 Genesis and Agency: Individual vs. State

The most striking contrast lies in the genesis and agency behind these architectural expressions. Taiwan’s tiě chuāng huā are a quintessential example of bottom-up urbanism. They represent individual artistic expression, a spontaneous folk art movement enabled by economic prosperity and relatively minimal state intervention in residential aesthetics. The agency rested primarily with individual homeowners and local metalworkers, resulting in a diverse, idiosyncratic, and highly personalized urban facade.

In contrast, Singapore’s HDB architecture is a testament to top-down, state-led urban planning. The void decks, unique block designs, and public art were meticulously conceived and implemented by government bodies and architects like Khor Ean Ghee and Liu Thai Ker. The aim was to engineer a cohesive society, optimize land use, and provide high-quality public housing, with every design element serving a specific social or functional purpose. The agency here resided with the state, shaping a collective urban identity through standardized yet thoughtfully designed communal spaces.

4.2 Expression of Identity: Personalization vs. Communalization

Both nations successfully created distinct urban identities, but through different lenses. Taiwan’s identity, as expressed through its grilles, leans towards individualistic personalization. Each grille tells a micro-story of the household it protects, collectively forming a rich tapestry of personal histories and aesthetic preferences across the urban fabric. It signifies a culture that values individual ingenuity and the ability to distinguish one’s private space.

Singapore’s HDB elements, on the other hand, foster a sense of communal identity. The void deck, widened corridors, and shared playgrounds are deliberately designed to promote interaction, social cohesion, and a shared experience among residents. The identity cultivated is one of a “vertical kampung,” where diverse communities co-exist and interact within well-planned, shared public spaces. The aesthetic is one of ordered beauty, reflecting multicultural harmony and national unity.

4.3 Economic Reflection and Social Values

Both architectural forms are direct reflections of their respective post-war economic miracles. Taiwan’s tiě chuāng huā emerged from a period where individual wealth manifested in the personalization of private property, showcasing a burgeoning middle class’s ability to invest in both security and aesthetics for their homes. This reflected values of family, security, and personal achievement.

Singapore’s HDB architecture, conversely, reflects a state-orchestrated prosperity channeled into public amenities and housing for the masses. The sophisticated planning and iconic designs speak to a national investment in social welfare, efficiency, and the creation of a harmonious multicultural society. Values here are centered on collective good, social equality, and pragmatic urban solutions.

5. Conclusion

The urban landscapes of Taiwan and Singapore, with their “steel flowers” and “concrete gardens,” offer compelling narratives of national development, cultural expression, and identity formation. Taiwan’s tiě chuāng huā, born from individual artistic freedom and economic boom, transformed functional security elements into a vibrant, spontaneous folk art, imbuing standardized buildings with personalized character. In contrast, Singapore’s HDB architectural elements, meticulously designed and state-planned, created iconic communal spaces and typologies focused on social cohesion, efficiency, and a distinct national aesthetic.

Despite their divergent origins – one bottom-up and individualized, the other top-down and communal – both approaches have demonstrably succeeded in forging unique and meaningful architectural cultures. These architectural elements are not merely physical structures; they are profound embodiments of social values, economic histories, and cultural identities. They form the very vocabulary through which these cities speak about themselves, telling compelling stories of transformation, aspiration, community, and belonging.

As urban environments continue to evolve, the study of such phenomena reminds us that even the most seemingly ordinary architectural details contain extraordinary cultural richness. Understanding and appreciating these stories is crucial, not only for academic insight but also for informing preservation efforts and ensuring that these tangible cultural assets continue to define and enrich the urban experiences of future generations.

References
Exploring future of Taipei’s residential architecture | Taiwan News | May. 9, 2023 13:56. (n.d.).
How Much Does HDB Window Grilles Cost In Singapore? – Window Grill Singapore™. (n.d.).
Issue 15: The Folk Spirit Dwelling Within Decorative Window Grilles – WINDOW RESEARCH INSTITUTE. (n.d.).
Public Housing, Private Lives. (n.d.).
Recapturing the Taiwan Miracle – Diversifying the Economy …. (n.d.).
Stamp of Success: how Made in Taiwan contributed to an economic miracle – The Boar. (n.d.).
Taiwan Miracle – Wikipedia. (n.d.).
Taiwan’s “Economic Miracle” and the Prospect for Unification with Mainland China | China without mao: The Search for a New Order | Oxford Academic. (n.d.).

Steel Flowers and Concrete Gardens

Part One: The Metalworker’s Daughter

Taipei, 1978

Mei-ling watched her father’s hands move with the practiced grace of a calligrapher, except instead of brush and ink, he wielded a welding torch and steel rods. Sparks cascaded like fireflies in the dim workshop as he bent another bar into a perfect curve, part of an elaborate plum blossom design for the Chen family’s new apartment.

“See here,” Ah-ba said, lifting his protective mask, his weathered face split by a proud smile. “Mrs. Chen wanted something traditional, but also modern. So I give her Song Dynasty flowers, but in steel that will last a hundred years.”

At sixteen, Mei-ling had grown up in this workshop on Nanjing Road, surrounded by the smell of hot metal and the percussion of hammer on anvil. While other girls her age studied for university entrance exams or worked in garment factories, she sketched window grille designs in the margins of her textbooks, dreaming in curves and geometry.

“You think it’s foolish,” her father said, reading her silence. “Your teachers say Taiwan must look to the future, not the past.”

“No, Ah-ba,” Mei-ling protested. “I think it’s beautiful. I just wonder… will people still want these in ten years? Twenty?”

Her father set down his tools and gestured at the half-finished grilles leaning against every wall of the workshop—mountains and clouds for a doctor’s family, geometric Art Deco patterns for a banker, whimsical butterflies for a young couple expecting their first child.

“Look at these,” he said. “Each one tells a story. The Chen family wants plum blossoms because Mrs. Chen’s mother had a plum tree in her courtyard before they fled the mainland. The Wu family wants mountains because the father grew up in Hualien. These aren’t just security bars, Mei-ling. They’re memory made solid. They’re hope welded into steel.”

He picked up a sketch she’d drawn the previous week—an intricate design combining traditional cloud patterns with modern angular lines.

“This is very good,” he said quietly. “Maybe better than mine. You have my skill but also new eyes. Taiwan is changing fast, but we don’t have to forget who we are. Your generation can remember and imagine at the same time.”

That night, Mei-ling couldn’t sleep. She lay in bed listening to the sounds of Taipei’s transformation—construction crews working through the night, the rumble of trucks hauling steel and concrete, the distant whine of factory machinery. Through her window, she could see the decorative grille her father had made when she was born: a field of orchids, each petal individually shaped and welded, surrounding a rising sun.

She thought about her father’s words. Memory made solid. Hope welded into steel.

By morning, she had made her decision. She would learn the craft properly, not just sketch designs but master the torch and anvil. And she would document her father’s work, photograph every grille before it was installed, preserve this moment when Taiwan’s prosperity allowed beauty to bloom even on utilitarian surfaces.

She didn’t know then that she was witnessing something fleeting, that within decades these steel flowers would become endangered species in a city racing toward sleek modernity. She only knew that her father’s hands held knowledge worth preserving, and that every window grille he created was a love letter to a city transforming faster than anyone could quite comprehend.

---

Part Two: The Architect’s Dilemma

Singapore, 1982

Raymond Tan stood in the void deck of Block 84 Circuit Road at seven in the morning, clutching a clipboard and feeling profoundly uncertain about his career choices. Above him, the building rose twenty stories, home to three hundred families who were, at this exact moment, proving every assumption in his architectural thesis catastrophically wrong.

The void deck—which he had imagined as a serene communal space, perhaps with elderly residents practicing tai chi or children playing quietly—had transformed into something between a wet market, a community center, and controlled chaos.

At one end, Mdm. Fatimah was setting up tables for her daughter’s wedding reception that evening, draping fabric between pillars while her sisters argued cheerfully about the placement of the dais. At the other end, the Tan family (no relation) had erected a traditional Chinese funeral altar, complete with incense, offerings, and a Buddhist monk chanting prayers. In between, a group of teenagers had claimed three parking spaces for an impromptu badminton game, while Mr. Krishnan conducted his morning bird-singing session, bamboo cages hanging from hooks he’d somehow attached to the ceiling.

“This is not what I designed,” Raymond muttered, but Mrs. Lee, the block’s unofficial matriarch, overheard him.

“Ah, you the architect, right? The HDB boy?” She was seventy if she was a day, with the kind of fierce intelligence that had probably terrified more capable men than him. “You design good. Very practical. But you think too much about what people should do, not enough about what people want to do.”

“But the void deck was meant for—”

“Meant for community,” Mrs. Lee interrupted. “And this is community. You think community means everyone sitting nicely in straight lines? Community is messy. Community is wedding and funeral same day, because life doesn’t wait for convenient scheduling. Community is Mr. Krishnan’s birds waking up Baby Sarah in 12-A, and Sarah’s mother learning to sleep through it because Mr. Krishnan gives Sarah ang pow every New Year.”

She pointed at the pillars, which Raymond had specified should be kept clean and white. They were now covered in notices—tuition offers, house cleaning services, lost cat posters, invitations to grassroots events.

“You see problem. I see life,” Mrs. Lee said. “Your void deck very good because it has space. Space for people to fill with their own meaning. You give us empty, we make it full.”

Raymond spent the rest of the morning watching and taking notes. He saw how Mdm. Fatimah negotiated with the Tan family about space, how they agreed to angle the funeral altar to give the wedding area better flow. He saw how the teenagers paused their badminton game when the monk needed quiet for prayers, then resumed when he finished. He saw how Mr. Krishnan’s birds attracted Uncle Chen from the next block, and how their conversation about breeding techniques naturally evolved into updates about their grandchildren.

He saw, for the first time really saw, that architecture wasn’t just about structures. It was about creating possibility spaces that communities could inhabit with their own meanings, traditions, and improvisations.

That afternoon, back at the HDB office, he revised his proposal for the new Bedok development. More void decks, yes, but also longer corridors with wider landings where neighbors might encounter each other. More variation in block orientation to create sheltered pockets. Built-in hooks and fixtures that acknowledged people would want to personalize their spaces.

His supervisor, Mr. Liu Thai Ker, reviewed the changes and smiled slightly.

“You’re learning,” Liu said. “Good architecture in Singapore isn’t about imposing order. It’s about designing flexible frameworks that can contain our beautiful, messy, multicultural chaos. The void deck works not because we planned every use, but because we left it open enough for communities to make it their own.”

He pointed to Raymond’s sketch of colored façades, each block in a neighborhood with complementary but distinct pastel shades.

“This is good too. Standardization doesn’t mean uniformity. We can give every estate its own character while maintaining efficiency. Make people proud of where they live. Give them landmarks in their daily landscape.”

Raymond looked at his drawings with new eyes. He had started his career thinking architecture was about control, about imposing rational order on urban chaos. Now he understood it was about creating stages for human drama, providing structure while allowing improvisation, standardizing what must be standardized while preserving space for community to flourish in its own unpredictable ways.

Through the office window, he could see a dozen HDB blocks, each with its distinctive void deck. From above, they looked like concrete boxes. But he knew now that each one contained multitudes—weddings and funerals, bird songs and badminton games, gossip and kindness, the daily negotiations that transformed anonymous housing blocks into neighborhoods, neighbors into communities, concrete and steel into home.

---

Part Three: The Preservationist’s Mission

Taipei, 2015

Chen Wei-ting climbed the narrow stairs to the fourth floor of a condemned building on Dihua Street, camera in hand, racing against time and the demolition crew scheduled to arrive the next morning. His project, “Old House Face,” had documented hundreds of Taipei’s vanishing architectural details over the past two years, but he felt he was losing the race.

The window grille on the fourth floor was everything he’d hoped for and feared he’d miss—an elaborate composition featuring phoenixes rising through stylized clouds, each feather individually shaped, the metalwork so delicate it seemed impossible that it had protected this window through forty years of typhoons.

Through the viewfinder, Wei-ting captured the morning light filtering through the steel curves, creating shadows that danced across the peeling wall. Each photograph felt like a small act of resistance against forgetting.

His phone rang. His mother.

“Wei-ting, your grandmother wants to talk to you.”

His A-ma’s voice crackled through the line, sharp despite her ninety years. “You’re taking pictures of old buildings again? Your mother says you quit the engineering job for this?”

“Yes, A-ma.”

“Foolish boy. Those old things are ugly. Taiwan needs to be modern, like Japan, like Singapore. Tear down the old, build new.”

Wei-ting had heard this argument from his family for two years. Only his father had understood, and his father was gone.

“A-ma, you remember your old apartment on Nanjing Road? Before you moved to the new building?”

“Of course. Dark, cramped, no elevator. Much better here.”

“Do you remember the window grille? The one that looked into the courtyard?”

Silence on the line. Wei-ting pressed on. “It had orchids, right? Your mother’s favorite flower. Grandfather had it specially made when you got married.”

“How do you know this?” A-ma’s voice had changed, become smaller.

“Father told me. He said you cried when they demolished that building. Not because you missed the apartment, but because of that window grille.”

More silence. Then, quietly: “It was beautiful. Your grandfather saved for three months to commission it. The metalworker was very skilled. Each petal was perfect.”

“That’s why I take these photographs, A-ma. So when these buildings are gone, the beauty won’t be completely forgotten. So your grandchildren’s grandchildren can see that their ancestors cared about beauty, even in ordinary things. That we weren’t just poor people grateful for any roof. We made art. We made our lives beautiful however we could.”

A-ma was crying now, soft sounds that made Wei-ting’s chest ache. “You sound like your father. Sentimental fool. But… maybe not completely foolish. Take good pictures, Wei-ting. Take good pictures.”

That evening, Wei-ting posted the phoenix window grille photos to the Old House Face Facebook page. Within hours, dozens of people had shared their own stories—their childhood homes, their grandparents’ apartments, the window grilles they remembered from their neighborhoods.

One woman wrote: “My father was the metalworker who made this! The Chen family commissioned it in 1975. My father passed away last year. I had no photos of his work. Thank you for preserving his art.”

Another comment: “I grew up in this building. We were the family in apartment 4-B. I learned to read looking through that window grille. The phoenixes were like friends. I hadn’t thought about them in thirty years.”

Wei-ting stayed up late reading every comment, feeling the weight and privilege of what he was doing. These weren’t just photographs of architectural details. They were triggers for memory, anchors for identity, evidence that people’s lives and choices and aesthetics mattered, had always mattered, would always matter.

---

Part Four: The Convergence

Taipei and Singapore, 2025

Mei-ling Zhao was seventy-three now, and the last traditional window grille metalworker still practicing in Taipei. Her workshop, relocated from Nanjing Road to a small space in Dadaocheng, attracted an unexpected clientele—not elderly people seeking to replace old grilles, but young architects, designers, and artists who wanted to learn the craft.

Today’s visitor was different. Raymond Tan, a retired HDB architect from Singapore, had traveled to Taipei specifically to meet her.

“I’ve studied your father’s work,” Raymond said, showing her a book he’d brought—a comprehensive photographic survey by Chen Wei-ting’s Old House Face project. “These window grilles… they’re similar to what we lost in Singapore. Not identical, but the same spirit. Beauty in utility. Memory in metal.”

Mei-ling turned the pages slowly, her arthritic fingers tracing the photographed steel curves. “My father made some of these. This one, the plum blossoms—I remember welding that with him. I was just learning.”

“Do you still take commissions?” Raymond asked.

“Sometimes. Mostly I teach now. Young people want to learn, can you imagine? They grow up with minimalism, with clean lines, with everything the same. Then they discover these old grilles and realize something is missing from their modern world.”

Raymond pulled out his laptop, showed her photographs of Singapore’s HDB terrazzo playgrounds, colorful corridors, distinctive void decks. “We did it differently in Singapore. More standardized, more regulated. But the intention was the same—creating beauty, community, identity within rapid development.”

“Both approaches have value,” Mei-ling said. “Taiwan’s way was more chaotic, more individual. Every family could express their taste, their history. Singapore’s way created shared spaces, collective identity. Different paths to the same goal—making home feel like home, not just shelter.”

“I want to create an exhibition,” Raymond said. “Comparing Taiwan’s window grilles with Singapore’s architectural heritage. Showing how both our societies tried to preserve humanity in rapid urbanization. Would you contribute your work?”

Mei-ling looked at the photographs of her father’s grilles, then at Raymond’s images of void decks where weddings and funerals happened side by side, of colorful dragon playgrounds where generations of children had played, of long corridors where neighbors had met and built communities.

“Yes,” she said. “People need to see this. They need to understand that development doesn’t require amnesia. That modernity doesn’t mean erasure. That we can move forward while honoring what came before.”

Six months later, the exhibition opened simultaneously in Taipei and Singapore, connected by video link. Chen Wei-ting’s photographs of window grilles hung beside Raymond’s documentation of HDB architecture. Mei-ling demonstrated traditional metalworking techniques while Singaporean artists showed how they were incorporating terrazzo and mosaic patterns into contemporary design.

The exhibition was titled “Steel Flowers and Concrete Gardens: The Poetry of Vernacular Architecture.”

On opening night, Raymond stood in the Singapore venue, watching families move through the exhibition. A grandmother pointed at a window grille photo and told her grandchildren about the apartment where she’d grown up. A young architect sketched details from terrazzo playgrounds, imagining how to incorporate those patterns into modern projects. A middle-aged man stood crying in front of a photograph of a void deck wedding, remembering his own.

In Taipei, Mei-ling watched a similar scene unfold. A young woman approached her afterward.

“My name is Chen Hsiao-wei,” she said. “My great-grandfather was the metalworker who made that phoenix window grille in Dihua Street. Your project helped me find his work. I’m studying architecture. I want to learn how to design buildings that people will love the way my family loved that apartment. Not despite the development, but because of thoughtful development. Can you teach me?”

Mei-ling smiled, feeling the weight of years and the lightness of hope in equal measure.

“Yes,” she said. “I can teach you. But remember—you’re not learning to copy the past. You’re learning to understand why the past mattered, so you can create a future that matters just as much. Different materials, different methods, but the same heart. Beauty matters. Memory matters. Community matters. Never forget that.”

That night, lying in bed in her small apartment, Mei-ling looked at the window grille her father had made sixty-seven years earlier—the field of orchids surrounding a rising sun. Through it, she could see the lights of modern Taipei, the new towers of glass and steel that had replaced so many of the old buildings.

But she could also see, if she looked carefully, a handful of buildings that still wore their steel flowers proudly. And she knew that somewhere out there, a new generation was learning that progress didn’t require forgetting, that modernity didn’t demand uniformity, that the future could honor the past while remaining wholly itself.

Memory made solid. Hope welded into steel. Beauty preserved in concrete and mosaic. Different cities, different methods, same essential truth: even the most ordinary urban landscapes contain extraordinary cultural richness, waiting to be seen, appreciated, and preserved for future generations.

The steel flowers would not bloom forever. But the memory of their blooming, and the lessons of why they mattered, could endure as long as people took time to look closely, to understand deeply, and to remember faithfully.

---

Epilogue

In 2045, Chen Hsiao-wei completed her first major architectural project—a mixed-use development in New Taipei City that incorporated traditional window grille patterns into parametric façade designs, using modern materials and digital fabrication to create structures that honored craft traditions while achieving contemporary performance standards.

The building’s community spaces featured void decks inspired by Singapore’s model, terrazzo floors with patterns drawn from both Taiwanese and Singaporean heritage designs, and common corridors wide enough to function as “streets in the sky” where neighbors could meet and build relationships.

On the dedication day, Mei-ling Zhao attended, ninety-three years old and still sharp. As she walked through the spaces, touching walls that somehow felt both entirely new and deeply familiar, she thought about her father’s words from sixty-seven years earlier.

Memory made solid. Hope welded into steel.

The materials had changed. The methods had evolved. But the heart remained the same.

And in the courtyard at the building’s center, Hsiao-wei had installed a sculpture—a monumental interpretation of a traditional window grille, scaled up and rendered in weathering steel that would patina over time, becoming more beautiful with age. The pattern combined orchids and phoenixes, mountains and clouds, traditional motifs and modern geometry.

At the base, a plaque read:

In memory of Taiwan’s metalworkers and Singapore’s visionary planners, who understood that even the most ordinary urban landscapes can contain extraordinary cultural richness. May we continue to look closely, understand deeply, and build beautifully.

Mei-ling touched the steel, still warm from the afternoon sun, and smiled.

The story continued. The conversation between past and future, tradition and innovation, individual expression and collective identity—it was endless, inexhaustible, always evolving.

And that, she thought, was exactly as it should be.