Executive Summary
The emerging defense partnership between Pakistan and Indonesia, centered on a potential acquisition of over 40 JF-17 Thunder fighter jets and Shahpar drones, represents a significant shift in Southeast Asian defense procurement patterns. This case study examines the strategic drivers, regional implications, and specific impacts on Singapore’s defense and foreign policy landscape.
Case Study: The Pakistan-Indonesia Defense Partnership
Background and Context
Indonesia’s defense modernization efforts have accelerated under President Prabowo Subianto, a former special forces commander who assumed office with a clear mandate to strengthen national defense capabilities. The country faces multiple security challenges including maritime territorial disputes in the South China Sea, the need to patrol the world’s largest archipelago, and an aging air force fleet requiring urgent replacement.
Pakistan’s emergence as a credible defense exporter stems from several converging factors. The May 2025 four-day air conflict with India served as an unexpected proving ground for Pakistani military hardware, particularly the JF-17 Thunder multi-role fighter. Pakistan’s claims that these jets performed effectively against more expensive Western and Russian systems generated international interest, particularly from nations seeking cost-effective alternatives to traditional Western defense suppliers.
The Deal Structure
According to security sources, the proposed arrangement includes:
- 40+ JF-17 Thunder fighter jets (jointly developed by Pakistan and China)
- Shahpar drones for surveillance and strike capabilities
- Air defense systems (specifications undisclosed)
- Comprehensive training programs for Indonesian Air Force personnel across all ranks
- Engineering and technical support infrastructure
While financial terms remain undisclosed, comparable JF-17 deals suggest a transaction value potentially ranging from $2-3 billion, making this one of Pakistan’s largest single defense exports.
Strategic Drivers for Indonesia
Economic Pragmatism: The JF-17, priced at approximately $25-30 million per unit, offers significant cost advantages compared to Western alternatives like the F-16 Block 70 ($70+ million) or European Typhoon ($100+ million). For a nation managing substantial defense modernization across all service branches, cost-effectiveness is paramount.
Diversification of Defense Suppliers: Indonesia’s procurement strategy deliberately spreads risk across multiple supplier nations. Current orders include French Rafales, Turkish KAAN fighters, with ongoing discussions for American F-15EX and Chinese J-10 jets. Adding Pakistani aircraft continues this diversification pattern, reducing dependency on any single supplier and associated political vulnerabilities.
Operational Flexibility: The JF-17’s Chinese co-development heritage provides Indonesia with access to Chinese weapon systems and avionics without the political complications of direct Chinese procurement. This offers Jakarta operational flexibility while maintaining diplomatic balance.
Technology Transfer Potential: Pakistan has demonstrated willingness to offer comprehensive technology transfer and local assembly arrangements in previous export deals. For Indonesia’s developing aerospace industry, this represents valuable opportunities beyond simple procurement.
Strategic Drivers for Pakistan
Economic Necessity: With foreign exchange reserves under pressure and a $350 billion economy requiring diversification, defense exports provide crucial hard currency earnings. The reported $10 billion in defense export deals during 2025 represents a significant economic achievement.
Geopolitical Positioning: Successfully exporting to Indonesia, Southeast Asia’s largest economy and a G20 member, elevates Pakistan’s international standing and demonstrates its capacity to engage beyond its traditional South Asian sphere.
China Collaboration Benefits: Each JF-17 export strengthens Pakistan’s co-development relationship with China while simultaneously advancing Chinese strategic interests in regional defense markets, creating mutual benefits that extend beyond immediate financial returns.
Industrial Base Sustainability: Export contracts provide production continuity for Pakistan’s defense industrial base, enabling economies of scale and justifying continued investment in research and development.
Regional Outlook
Shifting Defense Market Dynamics
Pakistan’s emergence as a significant regional arms exporter represents a structural shift in Asian defense markets. Traditional dynamics centered on major powers (United States, Russia, China, European nations) supplying smaller nations. Pakistan’s success introduces a new tier of suppliers offering:
- Proven platforms at mid-market price points
- Fewer political conditions attached to sales
- Greater flexibility in technology transfer and customization
- Faster delivery timelines compared to Western manufacturers facing production backlogs
This shift will likely accelerate as other nations observe Indonesia’s procurement choices. Bangladesh, Myanmar, and potentially Philippines and Malaysia may view Pakistani defense equipment as viable alternatives, particularly if Indonesia’s experience proves positive.
Implications for Major Power Competition
United States: The U.S. defense industry faces growing competition in Southeast Asia. Indonesia’s willingness to procure from Pakistan (offering Chinese-origin technology) alongside French, Turkish, and potentially American systems demonstrates reduced American leverage. Washington’s traditional use of defense sales as foreign policy tools becomes less effective when clients have credible alternatives.
China: Pakistan’s defense export success indirectly advances Chinese strategic interests. The JF-17 incorporates Chinese avionics, weapons systems, and design philosophy, effectively expanding Chinese defense technology footprint without the political sensitivities of direct Chinese sales. Beijing benefits from regional proliferation of systems compatible with Chinese doctrine and equipment.
India: Pakistan’s growing defense export portfolio, particularly to nations across Asia, represents a strategic concern for New Delhi. India’s own defense export ambitions have underperformed expectations, making Pakistan’s success particularly galling. The potential for Pakistani equipment operating in Southeast Asia creates new operational considerations for Indian military planners.
Southeast Asian Security Architecture Evolution
Indonesia’s defense procurement patterns signal broader trends in regional security thinking:
Reduced Alliance Dependence: Southeast Asian nations increasingly pursue security autonomy rather than relying on great power alliances. Diversified procurement portfolios support this strategic independence.
Pragmatic Engagement: Regional states demonstrate willingness to engage multiple powers simultaneously without exclusive alignment, frustrating both Washington and Beijing’s desire for clear alliance structures.
Indigenous Capability Development: Technology transfer demands in procurement deals reflect regional ambitions for domestic defense industries, reducing long-term import dependence.
Impact on Singapore
Strategic and Defense Implications
Enhanced Regional Military Capabilities: Singapore faces an evolving regional security environment where multiple neighbors operate increasingly sophisticated military equipment. Indonesia’s air force modernization, adding 40+ modern multi-role fighters alongside Rafales and KAAN aircraft, substantially increases regional military capabilities.
For Singapore’s defense planners, this necessitates:
- Continued investment in technological advantages to maintain qualitative edge
- Enhanced intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities to track regional force developments
- Potential acceleration of Singapore’s own fighter replacement programs (F-35 acquisition timeline, F-15SG upgrades)
- Increased emphasis on force multipliers (AWACS, aerial refueling, advanced air defense systems)
Operational Considerations: Indonesian JF-17s operating from bases in Sumatra or Kalimantan could conduct operations across maritime Southeast Asia, including areas of interest to Singapore. While Singapore-Indonesia relations remain positive, defense planning requires accounting for capabilities rather than intentions. The JF-17’s combat radius of approximately 1,200 km encompasses all of Singapore’s strategic interests.
Training and Interoperability Challenges: Singapore’s military trains extensively with traditional Western equipment and doctrine. The proliferation of Chinese-influenced platforms across Southeast Asia creates interoperability challenges for regional cooperation initiatives. Singapore may need to develop capabilities to operate alongside or against Chinese-derived systems, requiring new training regimens and operational concepts.
Economic and Industrial Implications
Defense Industry Competition: Singapore’s defense industrial base, including ST Engineering and other technology firms, faces growing regional competition. Pakistan’s willingness to offer comprehensive technology transfer and local production arrangements appeals to Southeast Asian nations seeking indigenous defense capabilities.
Singapore’s response might include:
- Enhanced emphasis on high-technology niche capabilities rather than platform production
- Stronger focus on systems integration and upgrade packages for existing regional equipment
- Potential partnerships with emerging regional defense firms to maintain market access
- Increased R&D investment to maintain technological leadership
Regional Arms Market Dynamics: Indonesia’s diversification away from exclusive reliance on Western suppliers affects regional defense trade patterns. Singapore, as a major hub for defense exhibitions and trade, may see evolving market dynamics as Chinese and Pakistani suppliers gain prominence alongside traditional Western firms.
Diplomatic and Foreign Policy Implications
ASEAN Cohesion Concerns: Indonesia’s growing defense ties with Pakistan, a nation outside Southeast Asia, reflects broader ASEAN member tendencies to pursue bilateral security arrangements beyond regional frameworks. This fragmentation challenges Singapore’s traditional preference for multilateral approaches to regional security.
India-Pakistan Dynamics in Southeast Asia: Singapore maintains strong relationships with both India and Pakistan, but growing Pakistani defense presence in Southeast Asia complicates this balance. India views Pakistan’s regional engagement with concern, potentially creating diplomatic tensions Singapore must navigate carefully.
China Factor: The JF-17’s Chinese co-development heritage means Indonesian procurement indirectly strengthens Chinese influence in regional defense sectors. Singapore, which carefully manages China relations while maintaining strong Western ties, must account for expanding Chinese defense technology presence across Southeast Asia.
U.S. Alliance Implications: Washington views Chinese defense technology proliferation with concern. Indonesia’s procurement choices, potentially followed by other Southeast Asian nations, may strain U.S. regional security architecture. Singapore, as a major U.S. security partner while maintaining ASEAN neutrality, faces delicate diplomatic positioning.
Recommendations for Singapore
Defense Planning:
- Maintain technological superiority through continued investment in cutting-edge capabilities
- Accelerate integration of fifth-generation fighter capabilities (F-35B/C acquisitions)
- Enhance ISR and C4I systems to monitor evolving regional capabilities
- Develop operational concepts for multi-platform, multi-doctrine regional environment
Economic Strategy:
- Position Singapore’s defense industry in high-value niches (avionics, precision systems, cybersecurity)
- Pursue partnerships with both emerging and established defense firms
- Leverage Singapore’s maintenance, repair, and overhaul hub status for diverse equipment types
Diplomatic Approach:
- Continue balanced engagement with all major powers
- Strengthen bilateral defense cooperation with Indonesia through exercises and exchanges
- Support multilateral regional security frameworks while accepting bilateral arrangements
- Maintain dialogue with both traditional and emerging defense suppliers
Conclusion
The Pakistan-Indonesia defense deal represents more than a simple transaction; it signals fundamental shifts in Asian security architecture, defense market dynamics, and regional power balances. For Singapore, these developments require strategic adaptation across defense, economic, and diplomatic domains.
Singapore’s historical approach—maintaining technological superiority, economic openness, and diplomatic flexibility—remains valid but requires recalibration for an era of multipolar defense markets and diversified regional security arrangements. The nation’s continued prosperity and security depend on successfully navigating these evolving dynamics while maintaining core strategic advantages.
The coming decade will test whether small, advanced nations like Singapore can sustain military-technological edges as larger regional powers modernize with cost-effective, capable equipment from diverse suppliers. Success requires sustained investment, strategic clarity, and diplomatic agility in an increasingly complex regional security environment.