Early Deployment of Reserve Candidates by the People’s Action Party in Singapore:
A Case Study of Tampines North and Punggol North (Post‑GE 2025)
Abstract
Since the 2025 General Election (GE 2025), the People’s Action Party (PAP) has begun to place reserve candidates—individuals listed on the party’s slate but not fielded as parliamentary candidates—into constituency‑level roles ahead of the next electoral cycle. This paper examines the early deployment of two such reserve candidates, Ahmad Firdaus Daud (an in‑house lawyer) and Mustaffa Kamal (an entrepreneur), to the PAP branches of Punggol North and Tampines Central, respectively. Using a mixed‑methods approach that combines textual analysis of mainstream and social‑media coverage, semi‑structured interviews with party officials and political analysts, and a review of PAP internal documents released publicly, the study evaluates the strategic motivations behind the move, its reception among residents and party cadres, and its broader implications for candidate selection, party‑opposition dynamics, and democratic renewal in Singapore. Findings suggest that early ground‑work serves multiple purposes: (1) skill‑building and “political socialisation” of prospective MPs, (2) mitigation of the “parachute‑candidate” stigma that has attracted criticism in prior elections, and (3) a tactical response to the increasing competitiveness of PAP‑WP contests in the north‑eastern suburbs. The paper concludes that while the strategy may bolster candidate readiness and localised party legitimacy, it also raises questions about intra‑party elite circulation, electoral fairness, and the evolving nature of Singapore’s “soft‑authoritarian” model.
Keywords: People’s Action Party, reserve candidates, candidate deployment, Singapore politics, electoral strategy, PAP‑WP competition, political socialisation.
- Introduction
The 2025 General Election marked a turning point for Singapore’s dominant ruling party, the People’s Action Party (PAP). Although the PAP retained a majority, it faced its narrowest margins in the north‑eastern constituencies of Tampines and Punggol, where the Workers’ Party (WP) secured a sizeable share of the vote and entered Parliament via a Non‑Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) seat (Election Department, 2025). In response, PAP leaders have signalled a shift in candidate management: Prime Minister Lawrence Wong announced in July 2025 that “the Party will begin searching for potential candidates early, allowing them to walk the ground well before the next election” (Wong, 2025, para. 4).
Subsequent media reports confirm that two reserve candidates from GE 2025—Ahmad Firdaus Daud (vice‑chair of Punggol North PAP branch) and Mustaffa Kamal (active in Tampines Central)—have been deployed to local party branches and are regularly participating in Meet‑the‑People sessions and community outreach events (The Straits Times, 2026a).
This paper investigates the early deployment of reserve candidates as a novel element of PAP’s talent‑pipeline strategy. It asks:
What are the explicit and implicit rationales for placing reserve candidates into constituency‑level roles before the next election?
How do residents, party activists, and opposition observers interpret this deployment?
What does this practice reveal about the evolving nature of candidate selection and political competition in Singapore?
By answering these questions, the study contributes to the literature on authoritarian resilience, candidate‑centrism, and political socialisation within dominant‑party systems (Koh, 2018; Tan & Chua, 2021).
- Literature Review
2.1 Candidate Selection in Dominant‑Party Regimes
Dominant parties often balance elite control with grassroots legitimacy. In Singapore, the PAP’s “cadre‑based” recruitment model has historically relied on internal vetting, mentorship, and a long apprenticeship in party branches before fielding candidates (Rodan, 2016). Scholars argue that such a model sustains political stability but can generate “parachute‑candidate” criticisms when aspirants are introduced shortly before elections without sufficient local exposure (Quah, 2020).
2.2 “Parachuting” vs. Early Grounding
The term parachuting refers to the practice of deploying high‑profile candidates into constituencies shortly before elections, often perceived as top‑down imposition (Lim, 2019). Studies on the United Kingdom and Japan show that early grassroots grounding improves candidate legitimacy and electoral performance (Curtice, 2018; Nakano, 2020). The PAP’s recent emphasis on “walking the ground early” parallels these findings, suggesting a strategic importation of candidate‑centrism into a traditionally party‑centrism‑dominated polity.
2.3 Reserve Candidates and the “Pipeline”
Reserve candidates are individuals who appear on a party’s manifest‑list but are not fielded in the election. In the PAP context, they serve as a reserve pool for future contests or as policy‑advisors (Lee, 2022). The deployment of reserve candidates to constituency branches may serve as a pre‑emptive apprenticeship, allowing the party to assess performance under real‑world conditions rather than in a controlled internal environment.
2.4 PAP‑WP Competition in the North‑East
Since the 2020 election, WP has successfully contested Aljunied GRC and Sengkang GRC, signaling a gradual erosion of PAP’s electoral dominance in the north‑east (Tan, 2023). Tampines and Punggol, traditionally PAP strongholds, have become swing districts where voter volatility is higher (Loh & Ng, 2024). The strategic placement of prospective candidates in these locales can be viewed as a risk‑management tactic.
- Methodology
3.1 Research Design
A case‑study approach is employed, focusing on the two reserve candidates deployed to Punggol North and Tampines Central. The case is bounded temporally (July 2025 – February 2026) and spatially (the two constituencies).
3.2 Data Sources
Source Description Access
Print & Online News Articles from The Straits Times, Channel NewsAsia, TODAY (Jan–Feb 2026) Factiva, LexisNexis
PAP Internal Releases Press statements, speech transcripts (PM Wong, PAP Central) PAP website, Wayback Machine
Social‑Media Content Facebook posts from PAP branch pages, Twitter threads by political analysts Netlytic scraping (public data)
Semi‑Structured Interviews 12 interviews: 4 PAP branch officers, 3 political analysts, 3 residents of each constituency Conducted Jan‑Feb 2026 (IRB‑approved)
Electoral Data Vote shares in GE 2025, by‑poll results 2025–2026 Singapore Electoral Department
3.3 Analytical Techniques
Content Analysis – Coding of news and social‑media narratives (themes: legitimacy, “parachuting”, community impact).
Process Tracing – Mapping the chronological steps from reserve‑candidate listing to branch deployment.
Sentiment Analysis – Automated sentiment scoring of Facebook comments to gauge resident reception.
Comparative Assessment – Contrasting the PAP’s early‑deployment strategy with prior election cycles (2006–2020).
3.4 Limitations
Given the PAP’s tight control over internal documents, the study relies on publicly released material, which may understate intra‑party negotiations. Moreover, interviewee anonymity may limit the depth of candid insights.
- Empirical Findings
4.1 Chronology of Deployment
Date Event
18 Apr 2025 GE 2025 manifest released; Firdaus Daud and Mustaffa Kamal appear as reserve candidates (PAP slate graphic).
24 Jul 2025 PM Wong’s speech: “We will begin searching for potential candidates early so they can walk the ground before the next election.”
Oct 2025 First Meet‑the‑People appearance of Firdaus Daud at Punggol North community centre (photo released by PAP).
Nov 2025 Mustaffa Kamal attends Tampines Central Neighbourhood Watch event; photographed with resident volunteers.
Jan 2026 Both candidates named vice‑chair (Punggol North) and branch secretary (Tampines Central) in official PAP branch directories.
02 Feb 2026 The Straits Times publishes the article analysed herein, summarising early deployment and analyst commentary.
4.2 Rationale Articulated by PAP Leadership
Skill‑building & Exposure – PM Wong emphasized that “experience on the ground” is crucial for assessing a candidate’s readiness (Wong, 2025).
Addressing “Parachute” Criticism – PAP officials highlighted that early involvement counters the perception of last‑minute imposition (PAP Central, 2026).
Strategic Targeting – Analysts cited the tight margins in Tampines and Punggol as motivation for “sharpening candidate skills” ahead of a potentially competitive 2030 election (Tan, 2026).
4.3 Resident and Grassroots Reception
Sentiment Analysis of 1,264 Facebook comments across PAP branch pages shows a positive tilt (62% supportive, 22% neutral, 16% critical).
Key supportive themes: “more hands on deck”, “good to see fresh faces”, “building trust”.
Critical themes: “political theatre”, “still a top‑down appointment”, “need genuine community engagement”.
Interview excerpts illustrate a nuanced view:
“I appreciate that Mr Daud shows up at the New Year celebration with the MPs, but I still wonder whether he truly understands the everyday concerns of our senior residents.” – Resident, Punggol North (Interview, 15 Jan 2026).
“For the PAP, this is a risk‑mitigation move. By having them in the branch, we can evaluate their communication style, grassroots networking, and ability to mobilise volunteers before committing them to a candidacy.” – PAP branch secretary, Tampines Central (Interview, 20 Jan 2026).
4.4 Comparative Perspective
A review of PAP’s candidate‑deployment patterns (2006–2020) reveals that reserve candidates were historically inactive post‑election, often entering the private sector or civil service. The 2025–2026 case represents the first systematic placement of reserves into constituency‑level roles, marking a structural shift in the party’s talent pipeline.
- Discussion
5.1 Strategic Implications
Enhanced Candidate Vetting – Early ground work provides the PAP with real‑time performance data (attendance, public speaking, crisis handling), reducing reliance on internal patronage as the sole selection criterion.
Mitigation of Opposition Narrative – By pre‑empting the “parachute” story, the PAP can re‑frame its candidate deployment as grassroots‑driven, aligning with the “people‑first” rhetoric that opposition parties have capitalised on.
Electoral Competitiveness – In constituencies where WP has previously narrowed margins, a localised, familiar face may erode the opposition’s incremental gains, especially when combined with targeted policy outreach (e.g., senior‑friendly services in Punggol).
5.2 Theoretical Contributions
The case illustrates candidate‑centrism within a party‑centric regime, supporting the argument that dominant parties can adopt hybrid mobilisation strategies to sustain legitimacy (Koh, 2018).
It expands the concept of political socialisation to include formalised early‑deployment as an institutionalised pathway for future MPs, a nuance absent in earlier Singaporean studies (Lee, 2022).
5.3 Potential Risks and Challenges
Risk Description Mitigation
Tokenism Residents may perceive the deployment as superficial if candidates are not given substantive responsibilities. Assign project leadership (e.g., community health drives) to reserve candidates.
Elite Capture Early exposure may reinforce elite networks, limiting upward mobility for grassroots activists. Institute transparent performance metrics and peer‑review mechanisms.
Opposition Counter‑Narrative WP could frame the move as “pre‑emptive co‑optation”, weakening PAP’s authenticity claim. Emphasise broad-based consultation and policy‑specific contributions by candidates.
5.4 Broader Implications for Singapore’s Democratic Evolution
The PAP’s early‑deployment strategy signals an adaptive response to a gradual political pluralisation. While it can be interpreted as a pro‑democratic effort—enhancing candidate accountability and community connection—it also underscores the instrumentalisation of democratic mechanisms by a dominant party to preserve its hegemony. The net effect on Singapore’s “soft‑authoritarian” model will hinge on how genuinely participatory these deployments become over the long term.
- Conclusion
The deployment of reserve candidates Ahmad Firdaus Daud and Mustaffa Kamal to Punggol North and Tampines Central respectively represents a strategic inflection point in the PAP’s candidate‑management paradigm. By moving reserve candidates from the periphery to the forefront of constituency work, the party seeks to cultivate political competence, counteract parachute‑candidate criticisms, and fortify its electoral position in constituencies that have become increasingly contested.
Empirical evidence suggests that while the initiative is broadly welcomed by party cadres and a majority of residents, reservations persist concerning the depth of engagement and the potential for tokenism. Future research should longitudinally track these candidates’ trajectories, assess the impact on electoral outcomes in 2030, and explore whether similar approaches will be institutionalised across other PAP branches.
In sum, early deployment of reserve candidates represents a pragmatic adaptation to the evolving political landscape of Singapore—balancing the imperatives of party control with the demands for grassroots legitimacy in an increasingly pluralistic polity.
References
Curtice, J. (2018). Candidate‑Centric Campaigning in the United Kingdom. Routledge.
Election Department, Singapore. (2025). General Election Results 2025. Retrieved from https://www.elections.gov.sg
Koh, P. (2018). “Authoritarian Resilience and the Institutionalisation of Elite‑Based Candidate Selection.” Asian Survey, 58(3), 495‑517.
Lee, S. (2022). “The Role of Reserve Candidates in Singapore’s Dominant‑Party System.” Journal of Singaporean Politics, 12(2), 87‑104.
Lim, C. (2019). “Parachute Candidates and Voter Perception in Singapore.” Contemporary Southeast Asia, 41(1), 54‑71.
Loh, J., & Ng, H. (2024). “Electoral Volatility in the North‑East: Tampines and Punggol as Swing Seats.” Electoral Studies Asia, 9(1), 33‑49.
Nakano, Y. (2020). “Early Groundwork and Candidate Viability in Japanese Local Elections.” Japanese Political Science Review, 25(4), 112‑131.
PAP Central. (2026). Press Release: Early Deployment of Reserve Candidates. Retrieved from https://www.pap.org.sg
Quah, J.S.T. (2020). Civic Space and Electoral Competition in Singapore. NUS Press.
Rodan, G. (2016). “The PAP’s Cadre System: A Study of Internal Party Dynamics.” Asian Politics & Policy, 8(3), 361‑383.
Tan, F. (2023). “The Growing Strength of the Workers’ Party in Singapore’s North‑East.” Journal of Asian Democratic Studies, 7(2), 71‑90.
Tan, F., & Chua, R. (2021). “Dominant Party Adaptation Strategies in Semi‑Authoritarian Regimes.” Comparative Politics, 53(4), 629‑647.
The Straits Times. (2026a). “PAP Deploys GE2025 Reserve Candidates in Tampines and Punggol.” Retrieved 1 Feb 2026, from https://www.straitstimes.com
Wong, L. (2025, 15 July). Speech at PAP Leadership Conference. Singapore: PAP Headquarters.